Beta testing is a critical practice for product and engineering teams to test and get feedback for their apps, websites, and physical products with real users before a new product launch or feature launch. By catching bugs, gathering UX feedback, and ensuring performance in real-world scenarios, beta testing helps teams launch with confidence. Fortunately, there are several specialized companies that make beta testing easier by providing platforms, communities of testers, and advanced tools.
This article explores five top online beta testing companies:
BetaTesting, Applause, Centercode, Rainforest QA, and UserTesting, discussing their strengths, specializations, how they differ, any AI capabilities they offer, and examples of their success. Each of these services has something unique to offer for startups and product teams looking to improve product quality and user satisfaction.
BetaTesting
BetaTesting.com is one of the top beta testing companies, and provides a web platform to connect companies with a large community of real-world beta testers. BetaTesting has grown into a robust solution for crowdsourced beta testing and user research and is one of the top rated companies by independent review provider G2 for crowdtesting services.
The platform boasts a network of over 450,000 participants across diverse demographics, allowing teams to recruit testers that match their target audience. BetaTesting’s mission is to simplify the process of collecting and analyzing user feedback, making even complex data easy to understand in practical terms. This makes it especially appealing to startups that need actionable insights without heavy lifting.
Key strengths and features of BetaTesting include:
Recruiting High Quality Real People: BetaTesting maintains their own first-party panel of verified, vetted, non-anonymous real-world people. They make it easy to filter and select testers based on 100’s of targeting criteria ranging from demographics like age, location, education, to advanced targeting such as product usage, health and wellness, and work life and tools.
BetaTesting provides participant rewards that are 10X higher than many competitive testing and research platforms. This is helpful because your target audience probably isn’t struggling to make $5 an hour by clicking test links all day like those on many other research platforms. Providing meaningful incentives allows BetaTesting to recruit high quality people that match your target audience. These are real consumers and business professionals spanning every demographic, interest, and profession – not professional survey takers or full-time taskers. The result is higher quality data and feedback.
Anti-Fraud Procedures: BetaTesting is a leader in providing a secure and fraud-free platform and incorporating features and tools to ensure you’re getting quality feedback from real people. Some of these steps include:
- ID verification for testers
- No VPN or anonymous IPs. Always know your testers are located where they say they are.
- SMS verification
- LinkedIn integration
- Validation of 1 account per person
- Anti-bot checks and detection for AI use
- Fraud checks through the incentive partner Tremendous
Flexible Testing Options in the Real World: BetaTesting supports anything from one-time “bug hunt” sessions to multi-week beta trials. Teams can run short tests or extended programs spanning days or months, adapting to their needs. This flexibility is valuable for companies that iterate quickly or plan to conduct long-term user research.
Testers provide authentic feedback on real devices in natural environments. The platform delivers detailed bug reports and even usability video recordings of testers using the product. This helps uncover issues with battery usage, performance, and user experience under real conditions, not just lab settings.
BetaTesting helps collect feedback in three core ways:
- Surveys (written feedback)
- Videos (usability videos, unboxing videos, etc)
- Bug reports
Check it out: Test types you can run on BetaTesting
Human Feedback for AI Products: When building AI products and improving AI models, it’s critical to get feedback and data from your users and customers. BetaTesting helps companies get human feedback for AI to build better/smarter models, agents & AI product experiences. This includes targeting the right people to power AI product research, evals, fine-tuning, and data collection.
BetaTesting’s focus on real-world testing at scale has led to tangible success stories. For example, Triinu Magi (CTO of Neura) noted how quick and adaptive the process was:
“The process was very easy and convenient. BetaTesting can move very fast and adapt to our changing needs. It helped us understand better how the product works in the real world. We improved our battery consumption and also our monitoring capabilities.”
Another founder, Robert Muño, co-founder of Typeform, summed up the quality of BetaTesting testers:
“BetaTesting testers are smart, creative and eager to discover new products. They will get to the essence of your tool in no time and give you quality feedback enough to shape your roadmap for well into the future.”
These testimonials underscore BetaTesting’s strength in rapidly providing companies with high-quality testers and actionable feedback. While BetaTesting also incorporates AI features throughout the platform, including AI analytics to help interpret tester feedback, including summarization, transcription, sentiment analysis, and more.
Overall, BetaTesting excels in scalable beta programs with real people in real environments and is a perfect fit for product teams that want to get high quality testing and feedback from real people, not professional survey clickers or taskers.
Applause
Applause grew out of one of the first crowdtesting sites called uTest and markets itself as a leading provider of digital quality assurance. Founded in 2007 as uTest, Applause provides fully managed testing services by leveraging a big community of professional testers. Applause indicates that they have over 1.5 million digital testers. This expansive reach means Applause can test digital products in practically every real-world scenario, across all devices, OSes, browsers, languages, and locations.
For a startup or enterprise releasing a new app, Applause’s community can surface issues that might only appear in specific regions or on obscure device configurations, providing confidence that the product works for “everyone, everywhere.”
What sets Applause apart is its comprehensive, managed approach to quality through fully managed testing services:
Full-Service Testing – Applause assigns a project manager and a hand-picked team of testers for each client engagement. They handle the test planning, execution, and results delivery, so your internal team isn’t burdened with logistics. The testers can perform exploratory testing to find unexpected bugs and also execute structured test cases to verify specific functionality. This dual approach ensures both creative real-world issues and core requirements are covered. Because it’s fully managed, it can be a lot more expensive than self-service alternatives.
Diverse Real-World Coverage – With testers in over 200 countries and on countless device/browser combinations, Applause can cover a wide matrix of testing conditions. For product teams aiming at a global audience, this diversity is invaluable.
Specialty Testing Domains – Applause’s services span beyond basic functional testing. They offer usability and user experience (UX) studies, payment workflow testing, accessibility audits, AI model training/validation, voice interface testing, security testing, and more. For example, Applause has been trusted to expand accessibility testing for Cisco’s Webex platform, ensuring the product works for users with disabilities.
AI-Powered Platform – Applause has started to integrate artificial intelligence into its processes like some of the other companies on this list. The company incorporated AI-driven capabilities, built with IBM watsonx, into its own testing platform to help improve speed, accuracy and scale” of test case management. Additionally, Applause launched offerings for testing generative AI systems, including providing human “red teaming” to probe generative AI models for security vulnerabilities.
In short, Applause uses AI both as a tool to streamline testing and as a domain, giving clients feedback on AI-driven products.
Applause’s track record includes many success stories, especially for enterprise product teams.
As an example of Applause’s impact, IBM noted that Applause enables brands to test digital experiences globally to retain customers, citing Applause’s ability to ensure quality across all devices and demographics.
If you’re a startup or a product team seeking fully managed quality assurance through crowdtesting, Applause is a good choice. It combines the power of human insight with professional management, a formula that has helped make crowdtesting an industry standard.
Centercode
Centercode takes a slightly different angle on beta testing: it provides a robust platform for managing beta programs and user testing with an emphasis on automation and data handling. Centercode has been a stalwart in the beta testing space for over 20 years, helping tech companies like Google, HP, and Verizon run successful customer testing programs. Instead of primarily supplying external testers, it excels at giving product teams the tools to organize their own beta tests, whether with employees, existing customers, or smaller user groups.
Think of Centercode as the “internal infrastructure” companies can use to orchestrate beta feedback, offering a software platform to facilitate the process of recruiting testers, distributing builds, collecting feedback, and analyzing bug reports in one centralized hub.
Centercode’s key strengths for startups and product teams include:
Automation and Efficiency: Centercode aims to build automation into each phase of beta testing to eliminate tedious tasks. For instance, an AI assistant called “Ted AI” can “generate test plans, surveys, and reports in seconds”, send personalized reminders to testers, and accelerate feedback cycles. This can help lean product teams manage the testing process as it reduces the manual effort needed to run a thorough beta test.
Centralized Feedback & Issue Tracking: All tester feedback (bug reports, suggestions, survey responses) flows into one platform. Testers can log issues directly in Centercode, which makes them immediately visible to all stakeholders. No more juggling spreadsheets or emails. Bugs and suggestions are tracked, de-duplicated, and scored intelligently to highlight what matters most.
Rich Media and Integrations: Recognizing the need for deeper insight, Centercode now enables video feedback through a feature called Replays, which can records video sessions and provide analysis on top. Seeing a tester’s experience on video can reveal usability issues that a written bug report might miss. Similar to BetaTesting, it integrates with developer tools and even app stores, for example, it connects with Apple TestFlight and Google Play Console to automate mobile beta distribution and onboarding of testers. This saves time for product teams managing mobile app betas.
Expert Support and Community Management: Centercode offers managed services to help run the program if a team is short on resources. Companies can hire Centercode to provide program management experts who handle recruiting testers, setting up test projects, and keeping participants engaged. This on-demand support is useful for companies that are new to beta testing best practices. Furthermore, Centercode enables companies to nurture their own tester communities over time.
Crucially, Centercode has also embraced AI to supercharge beta testing. The platform’s new AI capabilities were highlighted in its 2025 launch:
“Centercode 10x builds on two decades of beta testing leadership, introducing AI-driven automation, real-world video insights, seamless app store integrations, and expert support to help teams deliver better products, faster.”
By integrating AI, Centercode marries efficiency with depth, for instance, automatically scoring bug reports by likely impact.
Centercode’s approach is ideal for product managers who want full control and visibility into the testing process. A successful use case can be seen with companies that have niche user communities or hardware products: they use Centercode to recruit the right enthusiasts, gather their feedback in a structured way, and turn that into actionable insights for engineering. Because Centercode is an all-in-one platform, it ensures nothing falls through the cracks.
For any startup or product team that wants to run a high-quality beta program (whether with 20 testers or 2,000 testers), Centercode provides the scalable, automated backbone to do so effectively.
Check this article out: AI User Feedback: Improving AI Products with Human Feedback
Rainforest QA
Rainforest QA is primarily an automated QA company that focuses on automated functional testing, designed for the rapid pace of SaaS startups and agile development teams. Rainforest is best known for its testing platform that blends automated and manual powered testing on defined QA test scripts. Unlike traditional beta platforms that test in the real-world on real-devices, Rainforest is powered a pool of inexpensive overseas testers (available 24/7) who execute tests in a controlled, cloud-based environment using virtual machines and emulated devices.
Rainforest’s philosophy is to integrate testing seamlessly into development cycles, often enabling companies to run tests for each code release and get results back in minutes. This focus on speed and integration makes Rainforest especially appealing to product teams practicing continuous delivery.
Standout features and strengths include:
Fast Test Results for Defined QA Test Scripts: Rainforest is engineered for quick turnaround. When you write test scenarios and submit them, their crowd of QA specialists executes them in parallel. As a result, test results often come back in an average of 17 minutes after submission, an astonishing speed. Testers are available around the clock, so even a last-minute build on a Friday night can be tested immediately. This speed instills confidence for fast-moving startups to push updates without lengthy QA delays.
Consistent, Controlled Environments: A unique differentiator of Rainforest is that all tests run on virtual machines (VMs) in the cloud, ensuring each test runs in a clean, identical environment. Testers use these VMs rather than their own unpredictable devices. This approach avoids the “works on my machine” syndrome, results are reliable and reproducible because every tester sees the same environment.
While Applause or BetaTesting focus on real-world device variation, Rainforest’s model trades some of that for consistency; it’s like a lab test versus an in-the-wild test. This could mean fewer false alarms due to unique device settings, and easier bug replication by developers, but also a difficulty in finding edge cases and testing your product in real-world conditions.
No-Code Test Authoring with AI Assistance: Rainforest enables non-engineers (like product managers or designers) to create automated test cases in plain English using a no-code editor. Recently, they’ve supercharged this capability with generative AI. The platform can generate test scripts quickly from plain-English prompts essentially, you describe a user scenario and the AI helps build the test steps. Moreover, Rainforest employs AI self-healing: if minor changes in your app’s UI would normally break a test, the AI can automatically adjust selectors or steps so the test doesn’t fail on a trivial change. This dramatically reduces test maintenance, a common pain in automation. By integrating AI into test creation and maintenance, Rainforest ensures that even as your product UI evolves, your test suite keeps up with minimal manual updates.
Integrated Manual and Automated Testing: Rainforest offers both fully automated tests (run by robots) and crowd-powered manual tests, all through one platform. For example, you can run a suite of regression tests automated by the Rainforest system, and also trigger an exploratory test where human testers try to break the app without a script. All results – with screenshots, videos, logs – come back into a unified dashboard.
Every test run is recorded on video with detailed logs, so developers get rich diagnostics for any failures. Rainforest even sends multiple testers to execute the same test in parallel and cross-verifies their results for accuracy, ensuring you don’t get false positives.
Rainforest QA has proven valuable for many startups who need a scalable QA process without building a large in-house QA team. One of its benefits is the ability to integrate into CI/CD pipelines – for instance, running a suite of tests on each GitHub pull request or each deployment automatically. This catches bugs early and speeds up release cycles.
All told, Rainforest QA is a great choice for startups and companies that need script-based QA functional testing and prioritize speed, continuous integration, and reliable test automation. It’s like having a QA team on-call for quick testing to cut out repetitive grunt work.
UserTesting
UserTesting is a bit different than the other platforms on this list because they focus primarily on usability videos. While most of the pure beta testing platforms include the ability to report bugs, validate features, and get high-level user experience feedback, UserTesting is primarily about using usability videos ( screen recordings + audio) to understanding why users might struggle with your product or how they feel about it.
The UserTesting platform provides on-demand access to a panel of participants who match your target audience, and it records video sessions of these users as they perform tasks on your app, website, or prototype. You get to watch and hear real people using your product, voicing their thoughts and frustrations, which is incredibly insightful for product managers and UX designers. For startups, this kind of feedback can be pivotal in refining the user interface or onboarding flow before a broader launch.
UserTesting has since expanded through the merger with UserZoom to include many of the quick UX design-focused tests that UserZoom was previously known for. This include things like card sorting, tree testing, click testing, etc.
The core strengths and differentiators of UserTesting are:
Specialization in Usability Videos: UserTesting specializes in usability videos. This means that the platform is primarily about gathering human insights through video: what users like, what confuses them, what they expect. The result is typically a richer understanding of your product’s usability. For example, you might discover through UserTesting that new users don’t notice a certain button or can’t figure out a feature, leading you to redesign it before launch.
Live User Narratives on Video: UserTesting’s hallmark is the video think-aloud session. You define tasks or questions, and the testers record themselves as they go through them, often speaking their thoughts. You receive videos (and transcripts) showing exactly where someone got frustrated or delighted. This qualitative data (facial expressions, tone of voice, click paths, etc.) is something purely quantitative beta testing can miss. It’s like doing a live usability lab study, but online and much faster. The platform also captures on-screen interactions and can provide session recordings for later analysis.
Targeted Audience and Test Templates: UserTesting has a broad panel of participants worldwide, and you can filter them by demographics, interests, or even by certain behaviors. This ensures the feedback is relevant to your product’s intended market. Moreover, UserTesting provides templates and guidance for common test scenarios (like onboarding flows, e-commerce checkout, etc.), which is helpful for startups new to user research.
AI-Powered Analysis of Feedback: Dealing with many hour-long user videos could be time-consuming, so UserTesting has introduced AI capabilities to help analyze and summarize the feedback. Their AI Insight Summary (leveraging GPT technology) automatically reviews the verbal and behavioral data in session videos to identify key themes and pain points. It can produce a succinct summary of what multiple users struggled with, which saves researchers time.
The value of UserTesting is perhaps best illustrated by real use cases. One example is ZoomShift (a SaaS company) who drastically improved its user onboarding after running tests on UserTesting. By watching users attempt to sign up and get started, the founders identified exactly where people were getting stuck. They made changes and saw setup conversion rates jump from 12% to 87% – a >700% improvement in conversions. As the co-founder reported,
“We used UserTesting to get the feedback we needed to increase our setup conversions from 12% to 87%. That’s a jump of 75 percentage points!”
Many product teams find that a few hours of watching user videos can reveal UI and UX problems that, once fixed, significantly boost engagement or sales.
UserTesting is widely used not only by startups but also by design and product teams at large companies (Adobe, Canva, and many others are referenced as customers). It’s an essential tool for human-centered design, ensuring that products are intuitive and enjoyable.
In summary, if your team’s goal is to understand your users deeply and create an optimal user interface flows, UserTesting is the go-to platform. It complements the more high-level user experience and bug-oriented testing services by provided by the core beta testing providers and provdes the voice of the customer directly, helping you build products that truly resonate with your target audience.
Now that you know the Top 5 Beta Testing companies online, check out: Top 10 AI Terms Startups Need to Know
Still Thinking About Which One To Choose?
Get in touch with our team at BetaTesting to discuss your needs. Of course we’re biased, but we’re happy to tell you if we feel another company would be a better fit for your needs.
Have questions? Book a call in our call calendar.
BetaTesting Blog 