• BetaTesting.com Named a Leader in Crowd Testing & Software Testing by G2 in Fall & Summer 2025

    BetaTesting latest awards in 2025:

    best crowdtesting platformhigh performerfastest implementationregional leader

    BetaTesting.com was recently named a Leader by G2 for CrowdTesting and Software Testing in the 2025 Summer reports (in addition to the Spring 2025 and 2024 Winter reports). Here are our various rewards and recognition by G2:

    • Leader for Crowd Testing tools
    • The only company considered a Leader for Small Business Crowd Testing tools
    • Momentum Leader in Crowd Testing: Products in the Leader tier in the Momentum Grid® rank in the top 25% of their category’s products by their users
    • Fastest Implementation
    • Regional Leader – Products in the Leader quadrant in the Americas Regional Grid® Report are rated highly by G2 users and have substantial Satisfaction and Market Presence scores
    • High Performer in Software Testing tools
    • High Performer in Small Business Software Testing Tools
    • Users Love Us

    As of September 2025, BetaTesting is rated 4.7 / 5 on G2 and a Grid Leader.

    About G2

    G2 is a peer-to-peer review site and software marketplace that helps businesses discover, review, and manage software solutions

    G2 Rating Methodology

    The G2 Grid reflects the collective insights of real software users, not the opinion of a single analyst. G2 evaluates products in this category using an algorithm that incorporates both user-submitted reviews and data from third-party sources. For technology buyers, the Grid serves as a helpful guide to quickly identify top-performing products and connect with peers who have relevant experience. For vendors, media, investors, and analysts, it offers valuable benchmarks for comparing products and analyzing market trends.

    Products in the Leader quadrant in the Grid® Report are rated highly by G2 users and have substantial Satisfaction and Market Presence scores.

    Have questions? Book a call in our call calendar.

  • Top Tools to Get Human Feedback for AI Models

    When developing and fine-tuning AI models, effective human feedback is a critical part of the process. But the quality of the data you collect, and the effectiveness of your fine-tuning efforts are only as good as the quality of the humans providing the data.

    The challenge is that gathering this kind of high-quality feedback can be complex and time-consuming without the right support. This is where specialized AI feedback / labeling / and annotation tools become critical. 

    Here’s what we will explore:

    1. Platforms for Recruiting Human Testers
    2. Data Labeling & Annotation Tools
    3. Tools for Survey-Based Feedback Collection
    4. Tools for Analyzing and Integrating Feedback

    The proper tools help you collect high-quality data, manage the workflows of feedback collection, and incorporate feedback efficiently into your AI development cycle. Instead of manually scrambling to find users or hand-label thousands of data points, today’s AI teams leverage dedicated platforms to streamline these tasks. By using such tools, product managers and engineers can focus on what feedback to collect and how to improve the model, rather than getting bogged down in the logistics of collecting it.

    Broadly, tools for collecting human feedback fall into a few categories. In the sections that follow, we’ll explore four key types of solutions: platforms for recruiting testers, data labeling and annotation tools, survey-based feedback collection tools, and tools for analyzing and integrating feedback. Each category addresses a different stage of the feedback loop, from finding the right people to provide input, to capturing their responses, to making sense of the data and feeding it back into your AI model’s refinement.

    By harnessing the top tools in these areas, AI product teams can ensure they gather the right feedback and turn it into actionable improvements, efficiently closing the loop between human insight and machine learning progress.


    Platforms for Recruiting Human Testers

    Engaging real people to test AI models is a powerful way to gather authentic feedback. The following platforms help recruit targeted users, whether for beta testing new AI features or collecting training data at scale:

    BetaTesting – BetaTesting.com is a large-scale beta testing service that provides access to a diverse pool of vetted testers. BetaTesting’s AI solutions include targeting the right consumers and experts to power AI product research, RLHF, evals, fine-tuning, and data collection.

    With a network of more than 450,000 first-party testers, BetaTesting allows you to filter and select testers based on 100’s of criteria such as gender, age, education, and other demographic and interest information. Testers in the BetaTesting panel are verified, non-anonymous, high quality real-world people.

    Prolific – A research participant recruitment platform popular in academia and industry for collecting high-quality human data. Prolific maintains a large, vetted pool of over 200,000 active participants and emphasizes diverse, reliable samples. You can recruit participants meeting specific criteria and run behavioral studies, AI training tasks, or surveys using external tools.

    Prolific advertises that they have trustworthy, unbiased data, making it ideal for fine-tuning AI models with human feedback or conducting user studies on AI behavior.

    UserTesting – A platform for live user experience testing through recorded sessions and interviews. UserTesting recruits people from over 30 countries and handles the logistics (recruitment, incentives, etc.) for you.

    Teams can watch videos of real users interacting with an AI application or chatbot to observe usability issues and gather spoken feedback.. This makes it easy to see how everyday users might struggle with or enjoy your AI product, and you can integrate those insights into design improvements.

    Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) – Amazon’s crowdsourcing marketplace for scalable human input on micro-tasks. MTurk connects you with an on-demand, global workforce to complete small tasks like data labeling, annotation, or answering questions. It’s commonly used to gather training data for AI (e.g. labeling images or verifying model outputs) and can support large-scale projects with quick turnaround. While MTurk provides volume and speed, the workers are anonymous crowd contributors; thus, it’s great for simple feedback or annotation tasks but may require careful quality control to ensure the data is reliable.

    Check this article out: Top 5 Beta Testing Companies Online


    Data Labeling & Annotation Tools

    Transforming human feedback into structured data for model training or evaluation often requires annotation platforms. These tools help you and your team (or hired labelers) tag and curate data, from images and text to model outputs, efficiently:

    Label Studio – is a flexible open-source data labeling platform for all data types. Label Studio has been widely adopted due to its extensibility and broad feature set. It supports images, text, audio, time series, and more, all within a single interface. It offers integration points for machine learning models (for example, to provide model predictions or enable active learning in the annotation workflow), allowing teams to accelerate labeling with AI assistance.

    With both a free community edition and an enterprise cloud service, Label Studio enables organizations to incorporate human feedback into model development loops, by annotating or correcting data and immediately feeding those insights into training or evaluation processes.

    LabelMe – an industry classic, free open-source image annotation tool originally developed at MIT. It’s a no-frills desktop application (written in Python with a Qt GUI) that supports drawing polygons, rectangles, circles, lines, and points on images (and basic video annotation) to label objects. LabelMe is extremely lightweight and easy to use, making it a popular choice for individual researchers or small projects. However, it lacks collaborative project features and advanced data management, there’s no web interface or cloud component, as annotations are stored locally in JSON format. Still, for quickly turning human annotations into training data, especially in computer vision tasks.

    LabelMe provides a straightforward solution: users can manually label images on their own machines and then use those annotations to train or fine-tune models.

    V7 – An AI-powered data labeling platform (formerly V7 Labs Darwin) that streamlines the annotation process for images, video, and more. V7 is known for its automation features like AI-assisted labeling and model-in-the-loop workflows. It supports complex use cases (medical images, PDFs, videos) with tools to auto-segment objects, track video frames, and suggest labels via AI. This significantly reduces the manual effort required and helps teams create high-quality training datasets faster, a common bottleneck in developing AI models.

    Labelbox – A popular enterprise-grade labeling platform that offers a collaborative online interface for annotating data and managing labeling projects. Labelbox supports images, text, audio, and even sequence labeling, with customization of label taxonomies and quality review workflows. Its strength lies in project management features (assigning tasks, tracking progress, ensuring consensus) and integration with machine learning pipelines, making it easier to incorporate human label corrections and feedback directly into model development.

    Prodigy – A scriptable annotation tool by Explosion AI (makers of spaCy) designed for rapid, iterative dataset creation. Prodigy embraces an active learning approach, letting you train models and annotate data in tandem. It’s highly extensible and can be run locally by data scientists. It supports tasks like text classification, named entity recognition, image object detection, etc., and uses the model’s predictions to suggest the most informative examples to label next. This tight human-in-the-loop cycle means AI developers can inject their feedback (through annotations) and immediately see model improvements, significantly accelerating the training process.

    CVAT (Computer Vision Annotation Tool) – An open-source tool for annotating visual data (images and videos), initially developed by Intel. CVAT provides a web-based interface for drawing bounding boxes, polygons, tracks, and more. It’s used by a broad community and organizations to create computer vision datasets. Users can self-host CVAT or use the cloud version (cvat.ai). It offers features like interpolation between video frames, automatic object tracking, and the ability to assign tasks to multiple annotators.

    For AI teams, CVAT is a powerful way to incorporate human feedback by manually correcting model predictions or labeling new training examples, thereby iteratively improving model accuracy.


    Tools for Survey-Based Feedback Collection

    Surveys and forms allow you to gather structured feedback from testers, end-users, or domain experts about your AI system’s performance. Whether it’s a post-interaction questionnaire or a study on AI decisions, these survey tools help design and collect responses effectively:

    Qualtrics – A robust enterprise survey platform known for its advanced question logic, workflows, and analytics. Qualtrics enables creation of detailed surveys with conditional branching, embedded data, and integration into dashboards. It’s often used for customer experience and academic research.

    For AI feedback, Qualtrics can be used to capture user satisfaction, compare AI vs. human outputs (e.g., in A/B tests), or gather demographic-specific opinions, all while maintaining data quality via features like randomization and response validation.

    Typeform – A user-friendly form and survey builder that emphasizes engaging, conversational experiences. Typeform’s one-question-at-a-time interface tends to increase completion rates and richer responses. You can use it to ask testers open-ended questions about an AI assistant’s helpfulness, or use logic jumps to delve deeper based on previous answers. The polished design (with multimedia support) makes feedback feel more like a chat, encouraging users to provide thoughtful input rather than terse answers.

    Google Forms – A simple, free option for basic surveys, accessible to anyone with a Google account. Google Forms offers the essentials: multiple question types, basic branching, response collection in a Google Sheet, and easy sharing via link. It’s ideal for quick feedback rounds or internal evaluations of an AI feature. While it lacks the advanced logic or branding of other tools, its strengths are simplicity and low barrier to entry. For instance, an AI development team can use Google Forms internally to ask beta testers a few key questions after trying a new model output, and then quickly analyze results in a spreadsheet.

    SurveyMonkey – One of the most established online survey platforms, offering a balance of powerful features and ease of use. SurveyMonkey provides numerous templates and question types, along with analytics and the ability to collect responses via web link, email, or embedded forms. It also has options for recruiting respondents via its Audience panel if needed. 

    Teams can integrate SurveyMonkey to funnel user feedback directly into their workflow; for example, using its GetFeedback product (now part of Momentive) to capture user satisfaction after an AI-driven interaction and send results to Jira or other systems. SurveyMonkey’s longevity in the market means many users are familiar with it, and its features (skip logic, results export, etc.) cover most feedback needs from simple polls to extensive user research surveys.

    Check this article out: Top 10 AI Terms Startups Need to Know


    Tools for Analyzing and Integrating Feedback

    Once you’ve gathered human feedback, whether qualitative insights, bug reports, or survey data, it’s crucial to synthesize and integrate those learnings into your AI model iteration cycle. The following tools help organize feedback and connect it with your development process:

    Dovetail – A qualitative analysis and research repository platform. Dovetail is built to store user research data (interview notes, testing observations, open-ended survey responses) and help teams identify themes and insights through tagging and annotation. For AI projects, you might import conversation logs or tester interview transcripts into Dovetail, then tag sections (e.g., “false positive,” “confusing explanation”) to see patterns in where the AI is succeeding or failing.

    Over time, Dovetail becomes a knowledge base of user feedback, so product managers and data scientists can query past insights (say, all notes related to model fairness) and ensure new model versions address recurring issues. Its collaborative features let multiple team members highlight quotes and converge on key findings, ensuring that human feedback meaningfully informs design choices.

    Airtable – A flexible database-spreadsheet hybrid platform excellent for managing feedback workflows. Airtable allows you to set up custom tables to track feedback items (e.g., rows for each user suggestion or bug report) with fields for status, priority, tags, and assignees. It combines the familiarity of a spreadsheet with the relational power of a database, and you can view the data in grid, calendar, or Kanban formats.

    In practice, an AI team might use Airtable to log all model errors found during beta testing, link each to a responsible component or team member, and track resolution status. Because Airtable is highly customizable, it can serve as a single source of truth for feedback and iteration, you could even create forms for testers to submit issues that feed directly into Airtable. Integrations and automation can then push these issues into development tools or alert the team when new feedback arrives, ensuring nothing slips through the cracks.

    Jira – A project and issue tracking tool from Atlassian, widely used for agile software development. While Jira is known for managing engineering tasks and backlogs, it also plays a key role in integrating feedback into the development cycle. Bugs or improvement suggestions from users can be filed as Jira issues, which are then triaged and scheduled into sprints. This creates a direct pipeline from human feedback to actionable development work.

    In the context of AI, if testers report a model providing a wrong answer or a biased output, each instance can be logged in Jira, tagged appropriately (e.g., “NLP – inappropriate response”), and linked to the user story for model improvement. Development teams can then prioritize these tickets alongside other features.

    With Jira’s integration ecosystem, feedback collected via other tools (like Usersnap, which captures screenshots and user comments) can automatically generate Jira tickets with all details attached. This ensures a tight feedback loop: every critical piece of human feedback is tracked to closure, and stakeholders (even non-engineers, via permissions or two-way integrations) can monitor progress on their reported issues.

    Notion – An all-in-one workspace for notes, documentation, and lightweight project management that many startups and teams use to centralize information. Notion’s strength is its flexibility: you can create pages for meeting notes, a wiki for your AI project, tables and boards for task tracking, and more, all in one tool with a rich text editor. It’s great for collating qualitative feedback and analysis in a readable format. For example, after an AI model user study, the researcher might create a Notion page summarizing findings, complete with embedded example conversations, images of user flows, and links to raw data. Notion databases can also be used in simpler cases to track issues or feedback (similar to Airtable, though with less automation).

    A team can have a “Feedback” wiki in Notion where they continuously gather user insights, and because Notion pages are easy to link and share, product managers can reference specific feedback items when creating spec documents or presentations. It centralizes knowledge so that lessons learned from human feedback are documented and accessible to everyone, from engineers refining model parameters to executives evaluating AI product-market fit.


    Now check out the Top 10 Beta Testing Tools


    Conclusion

    Human feedback is the cornerstone of modern AI development, directly driving improvements in accuracy, safety, and user satisfaction. No model becomes great in isolation, it’s the steady guidance from real people that turns a good algorithm into trustworthy, user-aligned product.

    By incorporating human insight at every stage, AI systems learn to align with human values (avoiding harmful or biased outcomes) and adapt to real-world scenarios beyond what static training data can teach. The result is an AI model that not only performs better, but also earns the confidence and satisfaction of its users.

    The good news for AI teams is that a wealth of specialized tools now exists to streamline every part of the feedback process. Instead of struggling to find testers or manually compile feedback, you can leverage platforms and software to handle the heavy lifting. In fact, savvy teams often combine these solutions, for example, recruiting a pool of target users on one platform while gathering survey responses or annotation data on another, so that high-quality human input flows in quickly from all angles This means you spend less time reinventing the wheel and more time acting on insights that will improve your model.

    A structured, tool-supported approach to human feedback isn’t just helpful, it’s becoming imperative for competitive AI development. So don’t leave your AI’s evolution up to guesswork. We encourage your team to adopt a more structured, tool-supported strategy for collecting and using human feedback in your AI workflows.

    Leverage the platforms and tools available, keep the right humans in the loop, and watch how far your AI can go when it’s continuously guided by real-world insights. The end result will be AI models that are smarter, safer, and far better at satisfying your users, a win-win for your product and its audience.


    Have questions? Book a call in our call calendar.

  • How to Build AI Into Your SaaS Product the Right Way

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the SaaS industry, from automating workflows to enhancing user experiences. By integrating AI features, SaaS products can deliver competitive advantages such as improved efficiency, smarter decision-making, and personalized customer experiences. In fact, one analysis projects that by 2025, 80% of SaaS applications are expected to incorporate AI technologies, a clear sign that AI is shifting from a nice-to-have to a must-have capability for staying competitive.

    Despite the enthusiasm, there are common misconceptions about implementing AI. Some fear that AI will replace humans or is prohibitively expensive, while others think only tech giants can leverage it. In reality, AI works best as an enhancement to human roles, not a replacement, and cloud-based AI services have made it more accessible and affordable even for smaller companies. Surveys show 61% of people are reluctant to trust AI systems due to privacy concerns, and about 20% fear AI will replace their jobs. These concerns underscore the importance of implementing AI thoughtfully and transparently to build user trust.

    The key is to build the right AI features, not AI for AI’s sake. Simply bolting on flashy AI tools can backfire if they don’t solve real user problems or if they complicate the experience. 

    In short, don’t build AI features just to ride the hype; build them to add genuine value and make things easier for your users. In this article, we’ll explore a step-by-step approach to integrating AI into your SaaS product the right way, from setting clear objectives through ongoing optimization, to ensure your AI enhancements truly benefit your business and customers.

    Here’s what we will explore:

    1. Clearly Define Your AI Objectives
    2. Assess Your SaaS Product’s AI Readiness
    3. Choose the Right AI Technologies
    4. Ensure High-Quality Data for AI Models
    5. Design User-Friendly AI Experiences
    6. Implement AI in an Agile Development Workflow
    7. Ethical Considerations and Compliance
    8. Monitoring, Measuring, and Optimizing AI Performance
    9. Case Studies: SaaS Companies Successfully Integrating AI

    Clearly Define Your AI Objectives

    The first step is to clearly define what you want AI to achieve in your product. This means identifying the specific problem or opportunity where AI can provide effective solutions. Before thinking about algorithms or models, ask: What user or business challenge are we trying to solve? For example, is it reducing customer churn through smarter predictions, personalizing content delivery, or automating a tedious workflow?

    Start with a problem-first mindset and tie it to business goals. Avoid vague goals like “we need AI because competitors have it.” Instead, pinpoint use cases where AI can truly move the needle (e.g. improving support response times by automating common queries).

    Next, prioritize AI opportunities that align with your product vision and core value proposition. It’s easy to get carried away with possibilities, so focus on the features that will have the biggest impact on your key metrics or user satisfaction. Ensure each potential AI feature supports your overall strategy rather than distracting from it.

    Finally, set measurable success criteria for any AI-driven functionality. Define what success looks like in concrete terms, for instance:

    Reduce support tickets by 30% with an AI chatbot, or increase user engagement time by 20% through personalized recommendations. Having clear, quantifiable goals will guide development and provide benchmarks to evaluate the AI feature’s performance post-launch. Clearly state the issue your product will address, identify who will use it, and set quantifiable goals. The development process is guided by clearly stated goals, which also act as benchmarks for success.

    In summary, define the problem, align with business objectives, and decide how you’ll measure success. This foundation will keep your AI integration purposeful and on track.

    Check it out: We have a full article on AI Product Validation With Beta Testing


    Assess Your SaaS Product’s AI Readiness

    Before diving into implementation, take a hard look at your product’s and organization’s readiness for AI integration. Implementing AI can place new demands on technology infrastructure, data, and team skills, so it’s crucial to evaluate these factors upfront:

    • Infrastructure & Tech Stack: Does your current architecture support the compute and storage needs of AI? For example, training machine learning models might require GPUs or distributed computing. Ensure you have scalable cloud infrastructure or services (AWS, Azure, GCP, etc.) that can handle AI workloads and increased data processing. If not, plan for upgrades or cloud services to fill the gap. This might include having proper data pipelines, APIs for ML services, and robust DevOps practices (CI/CD) for deploying models.
    • Team’s Skills & Resources: Do you have people with AI/ML expertise on the team (data scientists, ML engineers) or accessible through partners? If your developers are new to AI, you may need to train them or hire specialists. Also consider the learning curve. Building AI features often requires experimentation, which means allocating time and budget for R&D.

      Be realistic about your team’s bandwidth: if you lack in-house expertise, you might start with simpler AI services or bring in consultants. Remember that having the right skills in-house is often a deciding factor in whether to build custom AI or use third-party tools. If needed, invest in upskilling your team on AI technologies or partner with an AI vendor.
    • Data Availability & Quality: AI thrives on data, so you must assess your data readiness. What relevant data do you currently have (user behavior logs, transaction data, etc.), and is it sufficient and accessible for training an AI model? Is the data clean, well-labeled, and representative? Poor-quality or sparse data will lead to poor AI performance: the old saying “garbage in, garbage out” applies.

      Make sure you have processes for collecting and cleaning data before feeding it to AI. If your data is lacking, consider strategies to gather more (e.g. analytics instrumentation, user surveys) or start with AI features that can leverage external data sources or pre-trained models initially.

    Assessing these dimensions of readiness: infrastructure, talent, and data will highlight any gaps you need to address before rolling out AI. An AI readiness assessment is a structured way to do this, and it’s crucial for identifying weaknesses and ensuring you allocate resources smartly.

    In short, verify that your technical foundation, team, and data are prepared for AI. If they aren’t, take steps to get ready (upgrading systems, cleaning data, training staff) so your AI initiative has a solid chance of success.


    Choose the Right AI Technologies

    With objectives clear and readiness confirmed, the next step is selecting the AI technologies that best fit your needs. This involves choosing between using existing AI services or building custom solutions, as well as picking the models, frameworks, or tools that align with your product and team capabilities.

    One major decision is Build vs. Buy (or use): Should you leverage cloud-based AI services or APIs (like OpenAI’s GPT, Google’s AI APIs, AWS AI services), or develop custom AI models in-house? Each approach has pros and cons. Using pre-built AI services can dramatically speed up development and lower costs. For example, you might integrate a ready-made AI like a vision API for image recognition or GPT-4 for text generation. These off-the-shelf solutions offer rapid deployment and lower upfront cost, which is ideal if you have limited AI expertise or budget. The trade-off is less customization and potential vendor lock-in.

    On the other hand, building a custom AI model (or using an open-source framework like TensorFlow/PyTorch to train your own) gives you more control and differentiation. Custom AI solutions can be tailored exactly to your business needs and data, potentially giving a unique competitive edge. For instance, developing your own model lets you own the IP and tune it for your proprietary use case, making AI a strategic asset rather than a one-size-fits-all tool.  Many leading SaaS firms have gone this route (e.g. Salesforce built Einstein AI for CRM predictions, and HubSpot built AI-driven marketing automation) to offer features finely tuned to their domain.

    However, building AI in-house requires significant resources: expert talent, large datasets, and time for R&D. It often entails high upfront costs (potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars) and longer development timelines, so it’s an investment only pursue if the strategic value is high and you have the means.

    In some cases, a hybrid approach works best. Start with a third-party AI service and later consider customizing or developing your own as you gather data and expertise. For example, you might initially use a cloud NLP API to add a chatbot, then gradually train a proprietary model once you’ve collected enough conversational data unique to your users.

    Beyond build vs buy, also evaluate the type of AI technology suited for your problem. Are you dealing with natural language (consider language models or NLP frameworks), images (computer vision models), structured data (machine learning algorithms for prediction), or a combination? Research the current AI frameworks or foundational models available for your needs. For instance, if you need conversational AI, you might use GPT-4 via API or an open-source alternative. If you need recommendation engine, maybe a library like Surprise or a service like Amazon Personalize. AI agents and tools are evolving quickly, so stay informed about the latest options that fit your SaaS context.

    When choosing an AI tool or platform, consider these selection criteria:

    • Capability & Accuracy: Does the model or service perform well on your use case (e.g. language understanding, image accuracy)?
    • Ease of Integration: Does it provide SDKs/APIs in your tech stack? How quickly can your team implement it?
    • Scalability: Can it handle your user load or data volume as you grow?
    • Cost: What are the pricing terms (pay-per-use, subscription)? Ensure it fits your budget especially if usage scales up.
    • Customization: Can you fine-tune the model on your own data if needed? Some platforms allow custom training, others are black-box.
    • Vendor Reliability: For third-party services, consider the vendor’s stability, support, and policies (e.g. data privacy terms).

    For many SaaS startups, a practical path is to start simple with cloud AI services (“wrappers”), e.g. plug in a pre-trained model via API, which requires minimal technical expertise, making them popular for rapid deployment. As you gain traction and data, you can evaluate moving to more sophisticated AI integration, potentially building proprietary models for key features that differentiate your product.

    The right approach depends on your goals and constraints, but be deliberate in your choice of AI tech. The goal is to pick tools that solve your problem effectively and integrate smoothly into your product and workflow, whether that means using a best-in-class service or crafting a bespoke model that gives you an edge.


    Ensure High-Quality Data for AI Models

    Data is the fuel of AI. High-quality data is absolutely critical to building effective AI features. Once you’ve chosen an AI approach, you need to make sure you have the right data to train, fine-tune, and operate your models. This involves collecting relevant data, cleaning and labeling it properly, and addressing biases so your AI produces accurate and fair results.

    Data Collection & Preparation: Gather all the relevant data that reflects the problem you’re trying to solve. For a SaaS product, that could include historical user behavior logs, transaction records, support tickets, etc., depending on the use case. Sometimes you’ll need to integrate data from multiple sources (databases, third-party APIs) to get a rich training set. Once collected, data cleaning and preprocessing is a must.

    Real-world data is often messy, full of duplicates, errors, and missing values, which can mislead an AI model. Take time to remove noise and outliers, normalize formats, and ensure consistency. Data cleaning ensures the correctness and integrity of the information by locating and fixing errors, anomalies, or inconsistencies within the dataset.. Feeding your model clean, well-structured data will significantly improve its performance.

    Data Labeling Strategies: If your AI uses supervised learning, you’ll need well-labeled training examples (e.g. tagging support emails as “bug” vs “feature request” for an AI that categorizes tickets). Good labeling is vital“Without accurate labeling, AI models cannot understand the meaning behind the data, leading to poor performance.”

    Develop clear guidelines for how data should be labeled so that human annotators (or automated tools) can be consistent. It’s often helpful to use multiple labelers and have a consensus or review process to maintain quality. Depending on your resources, you can leverage in-house staff, outsourcing firms, or crowdsourcing platforms to label data at scale.

    Some best practices include: provide clear instructions to labelers with examples of correct labels, use quality checks or spot audits on a subset of labeled data, and consider a human-in-the-loop approach where an AI does initial auto-labeling and humans correct mistakes. Efficient labeling will give you the “ground truth” needed for training accurate models.

    Addressing Data Biases: Be mindful of bias in your data, as it can lead to biased AI outcomes. Training data should be as diverse, representative, and free from systemic bias as possible. If your data skews toward a particular user segment or contains historical prejudices (even inadvertently), the AI can end up perpetuating those.

    For instance, if a recommendation algorithm is only trained on behavior of power-users, it might ignore needs of casual users; or an AI hiring tool trained on past hiring decisions might inherit gender or racial biases present in that history. To mitigate this, actively audit your datasets. 

    Techniques like balancing the dataset, removing sensitive attributes, or augmenting data for underrepresented cases can help. Additionally, when labeling, try to use multiple annotators from different backgrounds and have guidelines to minimize subjective bias. Addressing bias isn’t a one-time task; continue to monitor model outputs for unfair patterns and update your data and model accordingly. Ensuring ethical, unbiased data not only makes your AI fairer, it also helps maintain user trust and meet compliance (e.g., avoiding discriminatory outcomes).

    In summary, quality data is the foundation of quality AI. Invest time in building robust data pipelines: collect the right data, clean it meticulously, label it with care, and continuously check for biases or quality issues. Your AI feature’s success or failure will largely depend on what you feed into it, so don’t cut corners in this phase.

    Check it out: We have a full article on AI User Feedback: Improving AI Products with Human Feedback


    Design User-Friendly AI Experiences

    Even the most powerful AI model will flop if it doesn’t mesh with a good user experience. When adding AI features to your SaaS product, design the UI/UX so that it feels intuitive, helpful, and trustworthy. The goal is to harness advanced AI functionality while keeping the experience simple and user-centric.

    Keep the UI Familiar and Simple: Integrate AI features in a way that aligns with your existing design patterns, instead of introducing weird new interfaces that might confuse users. A great example is Notion’s integration of AI: rather than a separate complicated UI, Notion triggers AI actions through the same / command and toolbar menus users already know for inserting content. This kind of approach “meets users where they are,” reducing the learning curve.

    Strive to augment existing workflows with AI rather than forcing users into entirely new workflows. For instance, if you add an AI recommendation panel, keep its style consistent with your app and placement where users expect help or suggestions.

    Communicate Clearly & Set Expectations: Be transparent about AI-driven features so users understand what’s happening. Label AI outputs or actions clearly (e.g. “AI-generated summary”) and provide guidance on how to use them. Users don’t need to see the technical complexity, but they should know an AI is in play, especially if it affects important decisions. 

    Transparency is key to building trust. Explain, in concise non-technical terms, what the AI feature does and any limitations it has. For instance, if you have an AI that analyzes data and gives recommendations, you might include a note like “Insight generated by AI based on last 30 days of data.” Also, consider explainability. Can users, if curious, get an explanation of why the AI made a certain recommendation or decision? Even a simple tooltip like “This suggestion is based on your past activity” can help users trust the feature.

    Transparency is key. Inform users when AI is at play, especially for critical functions. Consider the ‘explainability’ of your AI; can you articulate why a particular recommendation or decision was made? Design for trust, clarity, and intuitive interaction.

    Provide User Control: Users will trust your AI more if they feel in control of it, rather than at its mercy. Design the experience such that users can easily accept, tweak, or reject AI outputs. For example, an AI content generator should allow users to edit the suggested text; an AI-driven automation might have an on/off toggle or a way to override. This makes the AI a helpful assistant, not a domineering auto-pilot. In UI terms, that could mean offering an “undo” or “regenerate” button when an AI action occurs, or letting users confirm AI suggestions before they’re applied. By giving the user the final say, you both improve the outcome (human oversight catches mistakes) and increase the user’s comfort level with the AI.

    Build Trust through UX: Because AI can be a black box, design elements should intentionally build credibility. Use consistent visual design for AI features so they feel like a native part of your product (avoiding anything that looks overly experimental or unpolished). You can also include small cues to indicate the AI’s status (loading spinners with thoughtful messages like “Analyzing…”, or confidence indicators if applicable).

    Use friendly, non-judgmental language in any AI-related messaging. For instance, instead of a harsh “The AI fixed your errors,” phrase it as “Suggested improvements” which sounds more like help than criticism. Maintaining your product’s tone and empathy in AI interactions goes a long way.

    In short, focus on UX principles: simplicity, clarity, and user empowerment. Introduce AI features in-context (perhaps through onboarding tips or tutorials) so users understand their value. Make the AI’s presence and workings as transparent as needed, and always provide a way out or a way to refine what the AI does. When users find the AI features easy and even enjoyable to use, adoption will grow, and you’ll fulfill the promise of AI enhancing the user experience rather than complicating it.


    Implement AI in an Agile Development Workflow

    Building AI into your SaaS product isn’t a one-and-done project. It should be an iterative, agile process. Incorporating AI development into your normal software development lifecycle (especially if you use Agile/Scrum methodologies) will help you deliver value faster and refine the AI through continuous feedback. Here’s how to weave AI implementation into an agile workflow:

    Start Small with an MVP (Minimum Viable AI): It can be tempting to plan a grand AI project that does everything, but a better approach is iterative. Identify a small, low-risk, high-impact use case for AI and implement that first as a pilot. For example, instead of trying to automate all of customer support with AI at once, maybe start with an AI that auto-suggests answers for a few common questions. Build a simple prototype of this feature and get it into testing. This lets your team gain experience with AI tech on a manageable scale and allows you to validate whether the AI actually works for your users.

    These initial ‘minimum viable AI’ projects allow your team to gain experience, validate assumptions, and learn from real-world user interactions without committing extensive resources. In other words, iterate on AI just as you would on any product feature: build, measure, learn, and iterate.

    Integrate AI Tasks into Sprints: Treat AI development tasks as part of your regular sprint planning. Once you have an AI feature idea, break it down into user stories or tasks (data collection, model training, UI integration, etc.) and include them in your backlog. During each sprint, pick a few AI-related tasks alongside other feature work. It’s important to align these with sprint goals so the team stays focused on delivering end-user value, not just tech experiments.

    Ensure everyone (product, developers, data scientists) understands how an AI task ties to a user story. Frequent check-ins can help, because AI work (like model tuning) may be exploratory. Daily standups or Kanban boards should surface progress or obstacles so the team can adapt quickly.

    Continuous Testing & Validation: Testing AI features is a bit different from traditional QA. In addition to functional testing (does it integrate without errors?), you need to validate the quality of AI outputs. Include evaluation steps within each iteration. For instance, if you developed an AI recommendation module this sprint, test it with real or sample data and have team members or beta users provide feedback on the recommendations. If possible, conduct A/B tests or release to a small beta group to see how the AI feature performs in the real world.

    This feedback loop is crucial: sometimes an AI feature technically works but doesn’t meet user needs or has accuracy issues. By testing early and often, you can catch issues (like the model giving irrelevant results or exhibiting bias) and refine in the next sprint. Embrace an agile mindset of incremental improvement; expect that you might need multiple iterations to get the AI feature truly right.

    Collaboration Between Teams: Implementing AI often involves cross-functional collaboration: data scientists or ML engineers working alongside frontend/backend developers, plus product managers and designers. Break down silos by involving everyone in planning and review sessions. For example, data scientists can demo the model’s progress to the rest of the team, while developers plan how it will integrate into the app. This ensures that model development doesn’t happen in a vacuum and that UX considerations shape the AI output and vice versa.

    Encourage knowledge sharing (e.g., a short teach-in about how the ML algorithm works for the devs, or UI/UX reviews for the data folks). Also loop in other stakeholders like QA and ops early, since deploying an AI model might require new testing approaches and monitoring in production (more on that in the next section).

    Feedback Integration: Finally, incorporate user feedback on the AI feature as a regular part of your agile process. Once an AI feature is in beta or production, gather feedback continuously (user surveys, beta testing programs, support tickets analysis) and feed that back into the development loop.

    For example, if users report the AI predictions aren’t useful in certain scenarios, create a story to improve the model or adjust the UX accordingly in an upcoming sprint. Agile is all about responsiveness, and AI features will benefit greatly from being tuned based on real user input.

    By embedding AI development into an agile, iterative framework, you reduce risk and increase the chances that your AI actually delivers value. You’ll be continuously learning, both from technical findings and user feedback, and adapting your product. This nimble approach helps avoid big upfront investments in an AI idea that might fail, and instead guides you to a solution that evolves hand-in-hand with user needs and technology insights.

    Check it out: We have a full article on Top 5 Mistakes Companies Make In Beta Testing (And How to Avoid Them)


    Ethical Considerations and Compliance

    Building AI features comes with important ethical and legal responsibilities. As you design and deploy AI in your SaaS, you must ensure it operates transparently, fairly, and in compliance with data regulations. Missteps in this area can erode user trust or even lead to legal troubles, so it’s critical to bake ethics and compliance into your AI strategy from day one.

    Fairness and Bias: We discussed addressing data bias earlier; from an ethical design perspective, commit to fair and unbiased AI outcomes. Continuously evaluate your AI for biased decisions (e.g., does it favor a certain group of users or systematically exclude something?) and apply algorithmic fairness techniques if needed. Treat this as an ongoing responsibility: if your AI makes predictions or recommendations that affect people (such as lending decisions, job applicant filtering, etc.), ensure there are checks to prevent discrimination.

    Some teams implement bias audits or use fairness metrics during model evaluation to quantify this. The goal is to have your AI’s impact be equitable. If biases are discovered, be transparent and correct course (which might involve collecting more diverse data or changing the model). Remember that ethical AI is not just the right thing to do, it also protects your brand and user base. Users are more likely to trust and adopt AI features if they sense the system is fair and respects everyone.

    Transparency and Accountability: Aim to make your AI a “glass box,” not a complete black box. This doesn’t mean you have to expose your complex algorithms to users, but you should provide explanations and recourse. For transparency, inform users when an outcome is AI-driven. For example, an AI content filter might label something as “flagged by AI for review.” Additionally, provide a way for users to question or appeal AI decisions when relevant. If your SaaS uses AI to make significant recommendations (like financial advice, or flagging user content), give users channels to get more info or report issues (e.g., a “Was this recommendation off? Let us know” feedback button).

    Internally, assign accountability for the AI’s performance and ethical behavior. Have someone or a team responsible for reviewing AI outputs and addressing any problems. Regularly audit your AI systems for things like accuracy, bias, and security. Establishing this accountability means if something goes wrong (and in AI, mistakes can happen), you’ll catch it and address it proactively. Such measures demonstrate responsible AI practices, which can become a selling point to users and partners.

    Privacy and Data Compliance: AI often needs a lot of data, some of which could be personal or sensitive. It’s paramount to handle user data with care and comply with privacy laws like GDPR (in Europe), CCPA (California), and others that apply to your users. This includes obtaining necessary user consents for data usage, providing transparency in your privacy policy about how data is used for AI, and allowing users to opt out if applicable.

    Minimize the personal data you actually feed into AI models. Use anonymization or aggregation where possible. For instance, if you’re training a model on user behavior, perhaps you don’t need identifiable info about the user, just usage patterns. Employ security best practices for data storage and model outputs (since models can sometimes inadvertently memorize sensitive info). Also consider data retention. Don’t keep training data longer than needed, especially if it’s sensitive.

    If your AI uses third-party APIs or services, ensure those are also compliant and that you understand their data policies (e.g., some AI APIs might use your data to improve their models. You should know and disclose that if so). Keep abreast of emerging AI regulations too; frameworks like the EU’s proposed AI Act might impose additional requirements depending on your AI’s risk level (for example, if it’s used in hiring or health contexts, stricter rules could apply).

    Ethical Design and User Trust: Incorporate ethical guidelines into your product development. Some companies establish AI ethics principles (like Google’s AI Principles) to guide teams, for example, pledging not to use AI in harmful ways, ensuring human oversight on critical decisions, etc.

    For your SaaS, think about any worst-case outcomes of your AI feature and how to mitigate them. For instance, could your AI inadvertently produce offensive content or wrong advice that harms a user? What safeguards can you add (like content filters, conservative defaults, or clear disclaimers)? Designing with these questions in mind will help avoid user harm and protect your reputation.

    Being ethical also means being open with users. If you make a significant change (say you start using user data in a new AI feature), communicate it to your users. Highlight the benefits but also reassure them about privacy and how you handle the data. Perhaps offer an easy way to opt out if they’re uncomfortable. This kind of transparency can set you apart.

    In summary, treat ethics and compliance as core requirements, not afterthoughts. Ensure fairness, build in transparency, uphold privacy, and follow the law. It not only keeps you out of trouble, but it also strengthens your relationship with users. AI that is responsibly integrated will enhance user trust and contribute to your product’s long-term success.

    Monitoring, Measuring, and Optimizing AI Performance

    Launching an AI-powered feature is just the beginning, to ensure its success, you need to continuously monitor and improve its performance. AI models can degrade over time or behave in unexpected ways in real-world conditions, so a proactive approach to measurement and optimization is crucial. Here’s how to keep your AI running at peak value:

    Define Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): First, establish what metrics will indicate that your AI is doing its job well. These should tie back to the success criteria you defined earlier. For example, if you implemented AI for support ticket routing, KPIs might include reduction in response time, accuracy of ticket categorization, and customer satisfaction ratings. If it’s a recommendation engine, KPIs could be click-through rate on recommendations, conversion rate, or increase in average user session length.

    Set targets for these metrics so you can quantitatively gauge impact (e.g. aiming for the chatbot to resolve 50% of queries without human agent). Also monitor general product/business metrics that the AI is intended to influence (like churn rate, retention, revenue lift, etc., depending on the feature). By knowing what “success” looks like in numbers, you can tell if your AI feature is truly working.

    Continuous Monitoring: Once live, keep a close eye on those KPIs and other indicators. Implement analytics and logging specifically for the AI feature. For instance, track the AI’s outputs and outcomes. How often is the AI correct? How often do users utilize the feature? How often do they override it? Monitoring can be both automated and manual.

    Automated monitoring might include alerts if certain thresholds drop (say, the accuracy of the model falls below 80% or error rates spike). It’s also good to periodically sample and review AI outputs manually, especially for qualitative aspects like result relevance or content appropriateness. 

    User feedback is another goldmine: provide users and easy way to rate or report on AI outputs (thumbs up/down, “Was this helpful?” prompts, etc.), and monitor those responses. For example, if an AI recommendation frequently gets downvoted by users, that’s a signal to retrain or adjust. Keep in mind that AI performance can drift over time, data patterns change, user behavior evolves, or the model could simply stale if it’s not retrained. So monitoring isn’t a one-time task but an ongoing operation.

    Model Retraining and Optimization: Based on what you observe, be ready to refine the AI. This could mean retraining the model periodically with fresh data to improve accuracy. Many AI teams schedule retraining cycles (weekly, monthly, or real-time learning if feasible) to ensure the model adapts to the latest information. If you detect certain failure patterns (e.g., the AI struggles with a particular category of input), you might collect additional training examples for those and update the model.

    Use A/B testing to try model improvements: for instance, deploy a new model variant to a subset of users and see if it drives better metrics than the old one. Optimization can also involve tuning the feature’s UX. Maybe you find users aren’t discovering the AI feature, so you adjust the interface or add a tutorial. Or if users misuse it, you add constraints or guidance. Essentially, treat the AI feature like a product within the product, and continuously iterate on it based on data and feedback.

    User Feedback Loops: Encourage and leverage feedback from users about the AI’s performance. Some companies maintain a feedback log specifically for AI issues (e.g., an inbox for users to send problematic AI outputs). This can highlight edge cases or errors that metrics alone might not catch. For example, if your AI occasionally produces an obviously wrong or nonsensical result, a user report can alert you to fix it (and you’d want to add that scenario to your test cases).

    BetaTesting.com or similar beta user communities can be great during iterative improvement. Beta users can give qualitative feedback on how helpful the AI feature truly is and suggestions for improvement. Incorporating these insights into your development sprints will keep improving the AI. By showing users you are actively listening and refining the AI to better serve them, you strengthen their confidence in the product.

    Consider Specialized Monitoring Needs: AI systems sometimes require monitoring beyond standard software. For example, if your AI is a machine learning model, monitor its input data characteristics over time. If the input data distribution shifts significantly (what’s known as “data drift”), the model might need retraining. Also monitor for any unintended consequences. For instance, if an AI automation is meant to save time, make sure it’s not accidentally causing some other bottleneck. Keep an eye on system performance as well; AI features can be resource-intensive, so track response times and infrastructure load to ensure the feature remains scalable and responsive as usage grows.

    By diligently measuring and maintaining your AI’s performance, you’ll ensure it continues to deliver value. Remember that AI optimization is an ongoing cycle: measure, learn, and iterate. This proactive stance will catch issues early (before they become big problems) and keep your AI-enhanced features effective and relevant over the long term. In a sense, launching the AI was the training wheels phase. Real success is determined by how you nurture and improve it in production.

    Case Studies: SaaS Companies Successfully Integrating AI

    Looking at real-world examples can illustrate how thoughtful AI integration leads to success (and what pitfalls to avoid). Here are a couple of notable case studies of SaaS companies that have effectively embedded AI capabilities into their products:

    Notion: the popular productivity and note-taking SaaS, integrated generative AI features (launched as Notion AI) to help users draft content, summarize notes, and more. Crucially, Notion managed to add these powerful capabilities without disrupting the user experience. They wove AI tools into the existing UI; for instance, users can trigger AI actions via the same command menu they already use for other operations. This kept the learning curve minimal.

    They designed the feature to augment rather than replace user work. Users generate text suggestions, then they can accept or edit them, preserving a sense of human control. The tone and visual design of AI outputs were kept consistent and friendly, avoiding any sci-fi vibes that might scare users. The result was a widely praised feature, with millions signing up for the waitlist and users describing the AI as “magical” yet seamlessly integrated into their workflow.

    Key lessons: Notion’s success shows the importance of integrating AI in a user-centric way (familiar UI triggers, gentle onboarding, user control over AI outputs). It also validates charging for AI as a premium add-on can work if it clearly delivers value. By positioning their AI as a “co-pilot” rather than an autonomous agent, Notion framed it as a tool for empowerment, which helped users embrace it rather than fear it.

    Salesforce Einstein: the giant in CRM software, introduced Einstein as an AI layer across its platform to provide predictive and intelligent features (like lead scoring, opportunity insights, and customer support automation). Salesforce’s approach was to build proprietary AI models tailored to CRM use cases, leveraging the massive amounts of business data in their cloud. For example, Einstein can analyze past sales interactions to predict which leads are most likely to convert, or automatically prioritize support tickets by urgency. This initiative required heavy investment, dedicated data science teams, and infrastructure, but it gave Salesforce a differentiated offering in a crowded market.

    They integrated Einstein deeply into the product so that users see AI insights contextually (e.g., a salesperson sees an AI-generated “win probability” on a deal record, with suggestions on next steps). By focusing on specific, high-value use cases in sales, marketing, and service, they ensured the AI delivered clear ROI to customers (like faster sales cycles, or higher customer satisfaction from quicker support). 

    Key lessons: Salesforce demonstrates the payoff of aligning AI features directly with core business goals. Their AI wasn’t gimmicky, it was directly tied to making end-users more effective at their jobs (thus justifying the development costs). It also highlights the importance of data readiness: Salesforce had years of customer relationship data, which was a goldmine to train useful models. Other SaaS firms can take note that if you have rich domain data, building AI around that data can create very sticky, value-add features.

    However, also note the challenge: Salesforce had to address trust and transparency, providing explanations for Einstein’s recommendations to enterprise users and allowing manual overrides. They rolled out these features gradually and provided admin controls, which is a smart approach for introducing AI in enterprise SaaS.

    Grammarly: which is itself a SaaS product offering AI-powered writing assistance. Grammarly’s entire value proposition is built on AI (NLP models that correct grammar and suggest improvements). They succeeded by starting with a narrow AI use case (grammar correction) where the value was immediately clear to users. Over time, they expanded into tone detection, style improvements, and more, always focused on the user’s writing needs.

    Grammarly continuously improved their AI models and kept humans in the loop for complex language suggestions. A key factor in their success has been an obsessively user-friendly experience: suggestions appear inline as you write, with simple explanations, and the user is always in control to accept or ignore a change. They also invest heavily in AI quality and precision because a wrong correction can erode trust quickly. 

    Key lessons: Even if your SaaS is not an “AI company” per se, you can emulate Grammarly’s practice of starting with a focused AI feature that addresses a clear user problem, ensuring the AI’s output quality is high, and iterating based on how users respond (Grammarly uses feedback from users rejecting suggestions as signals to improve the model).

    Additionally, when AI is core to your product, having a freemium model like Grammarly did can accelerate learning. Millions of free users provided data (opted-in) that helped improve the AI while also demonstrating market demand that converted a portion to paid plans.

    Common pitfalls and how they were overcome: Across these case studies, a few common challenges emerge. One is user skepticism or resistance. People might not trust AI or fear it will complicate their tasks. The successful companies overcame this by building trust (Notion’s familiar UI and control, Salesforce providing transparency and enterprise controls, Grammarly’s high accuracy and explanations).

    Another pitfall is initial AI mistakes. Early versions of the AI might not perform great on all cases. The key is catching those early (beta tests, phased rollouts) and improving rapidly. Many companies also learned to not over-promise AI. They market it in a way that sets correct expectations (framing as assistance, not magic). For example, Notion still required the user to refine AI outputs, which kept the user mentally in charge. Lastly, scalability can be a hurdle. AI features might be computationally expensive.

    Solutions include optimizing models, using efficient cloud inference, or limiting beta access until infrastructure is ready (Notion initially had a waitlist, partly to manage scale). By studying these successes and challenges, it’s clear that thoughtful integration, focusing on user value, ease of use, and trust, is what separates winning AI augmentations from those that fizzle out.

    Conclusion

    Integrating AI into your SaaS product can unlock tremendous benefits: from streamlining operations to delighting users with smarter experiences, but only if done thoughtfully. A strategic, user-centric approach to AI adoption is essential for long-term success.

    The overarching theme is to integrate AI in a purpose-driven, incremental manner. Don’t introduce AI features just because it’s trendy, and don’t try to overhaul your entire product overnight. Instead, start with where AI can add clear value, do it in a way that enhances (not complicates) the user experience, and then iteratively build on that success.

    In today’s market, AI is becoming a key differentiator for SaaS products. But the winners will be those who integrate it right: aligning with user needs and business goals, and executing with excellence in design and ethics.

    Your takeaway as a product leader or builder should be that AI is a journey, not a one-time project. Start that journey thoughtfully and incrementally today. Even a small AI pilot feature can offer learning and value. Then, keep iterating: gather user feedback, refine your models, expand to new use cases, and over time you’ll cultivate an AI-enhanced SaaS product that stands out and continuously delivers greater value to your customers.

    By following these best practices, you set yourself up for sustainable success in the age of intelligent software. Embrace AI boldly, but also wisely, and you’ll ensure your SaaS product stays ahead of the curve in providing innovative, delightful, and meaningful solutions for your users.


    Have questions? Book a call in our call calendar.

  • Beta Testing on a Budget: Strategies for Startups

    Why Budget-Friendly Testing Matters

    Beta testing is often perceived as something only larger companies can afford, but in reality it can save startups from very expensive mistakes. In fact, beta testing is a low-cost tactic for squashing bugs and getting early feedback from your users to help you avoid costly errors before releasing your app. Skipping thorough testing might seem to save money up front, but it frequently leads to higher costs down the line.

    Studies have shown that fixing issues after an app’s launch can, according to an IBM study, be up to 15 times more expensive than addressing them during a controlled beta phase. Investing a bit of time and effort into a budget-friendly beta program now can prevent spending far more on emergency fixes, customer support, and damage control after launch.

    Here’s what we will explore:

    1. Why Budget-Friendly Testing Matters
    2. How to Do Tester Recruitment on a Budget
    3. Maximal Impact with Limited Resources
    4. Learning and Adapting without Overspending

    Internal quality assurance (QA) alone is not enough to guarantee real-world readiness. Your in-house team might catch many bugs in a lab environment, but they cannot replicate the endless combinations of devices, environments, and use patterns that real users will throw at your product. The answer is beta testing. Beta tests allow teams to validate applications with “real users” in real-world environments. It helps teams to get feedback from end users who represent an app’s actual user base.

    By putting your product into the hands of actual customers in real conditions, beta testing reveals issues and usability problems that internal testers, who are often already familiar with how the product is “supposed” to work, might miss. Testing with a small beta group before full release gives you confidence that the software meets end-user needs and significantly reduces the risk of unforeseen problems slipping through to production.

    Bugs and crashes are not just technical issues, they translate directly into lost users and wasted marketing spend. Users today have little patience for glitchy products. Crashes are a significant concern for mobile app users, with one study discovering that 62% of people uninstall an app if they experience crashes or errors, and even milder performance problems can drive customers away.

    Every user who quits in frustration is lost revenue, and also money wasted on acquiring that user in the first place. It’s far more cost-effective to uncover and fix these problems in a beta test than to lose hard-won customers after a public launch. In short, pouring advertising dollars into an untested, crash-prone app is a recipe for burning cash.

    Beyond catching bugs, beta testing provides an invaluable reality check on product-market fit and usability before you scale up. Features that made perfect sense to your development team might confuse or annoy actual users. Feedback from Beta users can confirm whether the product’s features and functionalities meet user needs and expectations, or reveal gaps that need addressing. Early user feedback might show that a much-anticipated feature isn’t as valuable to customers as assumed, or that users struggle with the navigation. It’s much better to learn these things while you can still iterate cheaply, rather than after you’ve spent a fortune on a full launch. In this way, beta testing lets startups verify that their product is not only technically sound but also genuinely useful and engaging to the target audience.

    Finally, to keep beta testing budget-friendly, approach it with clear objectives and focus. Define and prioritize your goals and desired outcomes from your beta test and prepare a detailed plan to achieve them. This will help you focus your efforts on what matters most and avoids spreading your team too thin. Without clear goals, it’s easy to fall into “test everything” mode and overextend your resources. Instead, identify the most critical flows or features to evaluate in the beta (for example, the sign-up process, core purchase flow, or onboarding experience) and concentrate on those.

    By zeroing in on key areas, such as testing for crashes during payment transactions or gauging user success in onboarding, you prevent unnecessary testing expenses and make the most of your limited resources. In short, budget-friendly testing matters because it ensures you catch deal-breaking bugs, validate user value, and spend only where it counts before you invest heavily in a public launch.

    Check it out: We have a full article on AI Product Validation With Beta Testing


    How to Do Tester Recruitment on a Budget

    Finding beta testers doesn’t have to break the bank. Here are some cost-effective strategies for recruiting enthusiastic testers on a small budget:

    Leverage Existing Users and Communities

    Start with people who already know and use your product, your existing customers or early supporters are prime candidates for a beta. These users are likely to be invested in your success and can provide honest feedback. In fact, if you have an existing app or community, your current users are good representatives of your target market and usually make for highly engaged beta testers. Since you already have a relationship with them, it will be easier to convince them to participate, and you know exactly who you’re recruiting. Likewise, don’t overlook enthusiastic members of online communities related to your product’s domain.

    For example, a design app startup could post in online design communities to invite users into its beta. Recruiting from familiar communities costs only your time, and their feedback can be highly relevant. However, be cautious with friends and family, they rarely represent your target users and their feedback is often biased. It’s fine to let close contacts try an early build, but be sure to expand to real target users for true validation.

    Use Beta Testing Platforms

    Another way to recruit testers on a budget is to leverage dedicated beta testing platforms and crowdtesting services. These services maintain pools of pre-screened beta users who are eager to test new products. For example, BetaTesting allows startups to quickly find targeted users for feedback and real-world testing, handling the recruiting legwork for you. This can save you time and is often more cost-effective than recruiting testers on your own.

    Such platforms let you specify the demographics or device types of your ideal testers, ensuring the feedback comes from people who closely match your intended audience. In short, you gain access to a ready-made community of testers and built-in tools to manage feedback, which allows even a tiny team to run a beta with dozens of people across different devices and regions.

    There are also free channels you can use to find testers. Depending on your target audience, you might post calls for beta users on social media, in niche forums, or on startup directories where early adopters look for new products. Posting in these venues often costs nothing but time, yet can attract users who love trying new apps. An active presence in relevant communities will make people more likely to join your beta invitation.

    The key is to go where your potential users already congregate and extend an invitation there. If you’ve been a genuine participant in those groups, your request for beta participants will be more warmly received.

    Offer Non-Monetary Incentives

    If you have the budget to provide fair incentives to participants, there’s no doubt that you’ll get higher quality feedback from more testers.

    But if you’re on a bootstrapped budget, you can get creative and motivate testers through low-cost rewards to show appreciation without straining your finances. For example, you might offer beta testers exclusive access or perks in the product. Rewarding your beta testers’ time and effort by giving them your app for free or a X months’ subscription is a nice thank you gesture. Early adopters love feeling like VIPs, so letting them use premium features at no charge for a while can be a strong incentive.

    Zero-budget rewards can also include in-app credits and recognition. If you offer in-app purchases or upgrades, you can reward your testers with in-app credit as a thank you. You can also add fun elements like gamification, for instance, awarding exclusive badges or avatars to beta testers to give an air of exclusivity (and it will cost you nothing). This makes testers feel appreciated and excited to be part of your early user group.

    The bottom line is that there are plenty of ways to make testers feel rewarded without handing out cash. By choosing incentives that align with your product’s value (and by sincerely thanking testers for their feedback), you can keep them engaged and happy to help while staying on budget.

    Check it out: We have a full article on Giving Incentives for Beta Testing & User Research


    Maximal Impact with Limited Resources

    When resources are limited, it’s important to maximize the impact of every test cycle. That means being strategic in how you conduct beta tests so you get the most useful feedback without overspending time or money. Here are some tips for doing more with less in your beta program:

    Start Small and Focused

    You don’t need hundreds of testers right away to learn valuable lessons. In fact, running a smaller, focused beta test first can be more insightful and easier to manage. Many experts recommend a staggered approach: begin with a very small group to iron out major kinks, then gradually expand your testing pool. Consider starting with a small number of testers and gradually increase that number as you go.

    Tip: at BetaTesting, we recommend you do iterative testing, which means to start with 25-50 testers for your initial test. Collect feedback, improve the product, and come back with another test at a larger scale of up to 100 testers. REPEAT!

    For example, you might launch a limited technical beta with just a few dozen testers focused primarily on finding bugs and crashes. Once those critical issues are fixed, you can expand to a larger group (perhaps a few hundred testers) to gather broader feedback on user experience and feature usefulness, and only then move to an open beta for final verification.

    This phased approach ensures you’re not overwhelmed with feedback all at once and that early show-stopping bugs are resolved before exposing the app to more users. By the time you reach a wide audience, you’ll have confidence that the product is stable.

    Prioritize Critical Features and Flows

    With a limited budget, you’ll want to get answers to the most pressing questions about your product. Identify the core features or user flows that absolutely must work well for your product to succeed, and focus your beta testing efforts there first. It might be tempting to collect feedback on every aspect of the app, but trying to test everything at once can dilute your efforts and overwhelm your team. Instead, treat beta testing as an iterative process.

    Remember that this is not an all-or-nothing deal; you can start by focusing your beta test on what you need most and then expand as you see fit. In practical terms, if you’re launching an e-commerce app, you might first ensure the checkout and payment process is thoroughly vetted in beta, that’s mission-critical. Then, once those key flows are validated, you can move on to less critical features (like user profiles or nice-to-have add-ons) in subsequent rounds.

    By clearly defining a few high-priority objectives for your beta, you make the best use of your limited testing resources and avoid spending time on minor issues at the expense of major ones.

    Use Structured Feedback Tools

    Gathering feedback efficiently is essential when your team is small and time is scarce. Rather than engaging in lengthy back-and-forth conversations with each tester, utilize surveys and other tools to collect input in a streamlined way. For example, set up a brief survey or questionnaire for your beta users to fill out after trying the product. You can use our standard BetaTesting final feedback survey to collect feedback, impressions, ratings, and NPS score among others. 

    Surveys are a quick and easy way to ask specific questions about your app, and there are many tools that can help you with that, for instance, you might ask testers to rate how easy key tasks were. Structured questions ensure you get actionable answers without requiring testers to spend too much time, which means you’re likely to receive more responses.

    Besides surveys, consider integrating simple feedback mechanisms directly into your beta app if possible. Many apps, including BetaTesting have in-app bug reporting mechanisms or feedback form that users can access with a shake or a tap. The easier you make it for testers to provide feedback at the moment they experience something (a bug, a UI issue, or confusion), the more data you’ll collect. Even if an in-app integration isn’t feasible, at least provide a dedicated email address for beta feedback so all input goes to one place.

    By combining easy survey tools with built-in feedback channels, you can quickly gather a wealth of insights without a lot of manual effort. This allows your small team to pinpoint the most important fixes and improvements swiftly, maximizing the value of your beta test.

    Check it out: How to Get Humans for AI Feedback


    Learning and Adapting without Overspending

    The true value of beta testing comes from what you do with the findings. For startups, every beta should be a learning exercise that informs your next steps.

    When your beta period ends, take time to analyze the results and extract lessons for the future. It’s a good idea to hold a brief post-mortem to evaluate the success of the beta test, looking not only at your product’s performance but also at how well your testing process worked. For instance, examine metrics like how many bugs were reported and how many testers actively participated to spot issues in the beta process itself.

    If few testers actually used the app or provided feedback, you may need to better engage testers next time. If many bugs went unreported, your bug reporting process might need improvement. By identifying such process gaps, you can adjust your approach in the next beta cycle so you don’t waste time on methods that aren’t effective.

    Above all, remember that beta testing is about failing fast in a low-stakes environment so that you don’t fail publicly after launch. 

    As highlighted in Escaping the Build Trap, it’s better to fail in smaller ways, earlier, and learn what will succeed rather than spending all the time and money failing in a publicly large way.

    If your beta revealed serious flaws or unmet user needs, that’s actually a win, you’ve gained that knowledge cheaply, before investing in marketing or a wide release. Take those lessons to heart, make the necessary changes, and iterate. Each new beta iteration should be sharper and more focused. In the end, the time and effort you put into a thoughtful beta test will be repaid many times over through avoided pitfalls and a better product.

    Beta testing on a budget is about working smarter, learning fast, fixing problems early, and iterating your way to a product that’s truly ready for prime time.

    Check it out: We have a full article on Global App Testing: Testing Your App, Software or Hardware Globally


    Conclusion

    Beta testing is one of the most valuable steps for a startup, and it doesn’t have to break your budget. By focusing on the core purpose of beta testing, putting your product into real users’ hands and listening to their feedback, you can glean critical insights and catch issues early without overspending.

    A lean beta program can validate your product-market fit, highlight what works (and what doesn’t), and ultimately save you time and money by guiding development in the right direction.

    Even on a tight budget, you can get creative with recruiting and testing strategies. Tap into low-cost channels like your existing user base or early-adopter communities, and focus your tests on the high-priority features or user flows that matter most to your success. By concentrating on what truly needs testing, you ensure every tester’s feedback counts, helping you refine the crucial parts of your product while avoiding unnecessary costs.

    Early user feedback is a goldmine, use it to iterate quickly, fix bugs, and enhance the experience long before launch, all without exhausting your limited resources.


    Have questions? Book a call in our call calendar.

  • Top 10 Beta Testing Tools

    Beta testing is the pivotal phase in software testing and user research where real users try a product in real-world conditions, helping uncover bugs and provide feedback to improve a product before public release (or before launching important new features) . A successful beta test requires the right tools.

    This article explores ten tools you need for beta testing: 

    From recruiting testers and distributing app builds to collecting feedback and tracking bugs, those ten tools each play a unique role in enhancing beta testing and ensuring products launch with confidence.


    BetaTesting

    Primary role: Recruit high quality beta testers with 100’s of criteria

    BetaTesting is a platform specializing in coordinating beta tests with large groups of real users. It boasts a community of hundreds of thousands of global testers and a robust management platform for organizing feedback. They provide real-world beta testing with a community of over 450,000 vetted, ID verified and non-anonymous participants around the world.

    Through BetaTesting, companies can connect with real world users and launch winning bug-free products. In practice, BetaTesting allows product teams to recruit target demographics (with 100+ criteria for targeting), distribute app builds or products, and collect structured feedback (surveys, bug reports, usability videos, etc.) all in one place.

    Scale and diversity is the value BetaTesting adds to your test, you can get dozens or even hundreds of testers using your app in real conditions, uncovering issues that internal teams might miss. BetaTesting also offers project assistance and fully managed tests if needed, helping companies ensure their beta test results are actionable and reliable.


    TestFlight

    Primary role: Distribute pre-release versions of your iOS app

    For mobile app developers, TestFlight is an essential beta testing tool in the Apple ecosystem. TestFlight is Apple’s official beta testing service that allows developers to distribute pre-release versions of their iOS apps to a selected group of testers for evaluation before App Store release. 

    Through TestFlight, you can invite up to 10,000 external testers (via email or public link) to install your iOS, iPadOS, macOS, or watchOS app builds. TestFlight makes it simple for testers to install the app and provide feedback or report bugs.

    By handling distribution, crash reporting, and feedback collection in one interface, TestFlight adds value to beta testing by streamlining how you get your app into users’ hands and how you receive their input. This reduces friction in gathering early feedback on app performance, UI, and stability on real devices.


    Firebase

    Primary role: Distributing the beta version of your Android or iOS app.

    Google’s Firebase platform offers a beta app distribution tool that is especially handy for Android (and also supports iOS). Firebase App Distribution makes distributing your apps to trusted testers painless. By getting your apps onto testers’ devices quickly, you can get feedback early and often. It provides a unified dashboard to manage both Android and iOS beta builds, invite testers via email or link, and track who has installed the app. This service integrates with Firebase Crashlytics, so any crashes encountered by beta users are automatically tracked with detailed logs.  

    The value of Firebase in beta testing lies in speed and insight: it simplifies getting new builds out to testers (no complex provisioning needed) and immediately provides feedback and crash data. This helps developers iterate quickly during the beta phase and ensure both major platforms are covered.

    Check this article out: AI vs. User Researcher: How to Add More Value than a Robot


    Lookback

    Primary role: Collect remote usability videos

    Lookback is a primarily known as a tool to make it easy for participants to record usability videos. This can be especially helpful in the case that you’re testing with your own users and asking them to use built-in screen recording tools (e.g. Screen Recording in iOS) might be too complex or confusing for them.

    The tool enables remote recording of testers’ screens, audio, and their faces as they use your product, which is invaluable for understanding the why behind user behavior.

    Lookback also helps teams conduct interviews, and collaborative analysis. The platform records user interactions through screen capture, audio, and video, providing a comprehensive view of the user experience. During a beta test, you might use Lookback to conduct live moderated sessions or unmoderated usability video tasks where testers think aloud. This helps capture usability issues, confusion, and UX feedback that pure bug reports might miss.

    Lookback’s value is in how it adds a human lens to beta testing, you don’t just see what bugs occur, but also see and hear how real users navigate your app, where they get frustrated, or what they enjoy. These insights can inspire UX improvements and ensure your product is truly user-friendly at launch.


    Instabug

    Primary role: In-app bug reporting.

    During beta testing, having an easy way for testers to report bugs and share feedback is crucial. Instabug addresses this need by providing an in-app bug reporting and feedback SDK for mobile apps. After a simple integration, testers can shake their device or take a screenshot to quickly send feedback.

    Instabug provides in-app feedback and bug reporting to mobile apps. It provides a seamless way for two-way communication with users, while providing detailed environment report for developers. When a tester submits a bug through Instabug, the platform automatically includes screenshots, screen recordings, device details, console logs, and other diagnostic data to help developers reproduce and fix the issue.

    This adds huge value to beta testing by streamlining bug capture, testers don’t need to fill out long forms or go to a separate tool; everything is collected in-app at the moment an issue occurs. Developers benefit from richer reports and even the ability to chat with testers for clarification. Instabug essentially closes the feedback loop in beta testing, making it faster to identify, communicate, and resolve problems.


    Tremendous

    Primary role: Rewards distribution the beta testers

    Keeping beta testers motivated and engaged often involves offering incentives or rewards. Tremendous is a digital rewards and payouts platform that makes it easy to send testers gift cards, prepaid Visa cards, or other rewards. 

    For beta testing programs, Tremendous can be used to thank testers with a small honorarium or gift (for example, a $10 gift card upon completing the test). The platform supports bulk sending and global options, ensuring that even a large group of testers can be rewarded in a few clicks.

    The value Tremendous brings to beta testing is in streamlining tester incentives, no need to purchase and email gift codes manually or handle payments one by one. A well-incentivized beta test can lead to higher participation rates and more thorough feedback, as testers feel their time is valued.

    Not sure what incentives to give, check out this article: Giving Incentives for Beta Testing & User Research


    Privacy.com

    Primary role: Virtual credit cards

    Sometimes beta testing a product (especially in fintech or e-commerce) requires users to go through payment flows. But you may not want beta testers using real credit cards, or you may want to cover their transaction costs. Privacy.com is a tool that can facilitate this by providing virtual, controllable payment cards. Privacy.com is a secure payment service that helps users shop safely online by allowing them to generate unique virtual card numbers. 

    In a beta test scenario, you could generate a virtual credit card with a fixed dollar amount or one-time use, and give that to testers so they can, for instance, buy a product in your app or subscribe without using their own money. Privacy.com cards can be set to specific limits, ensuring you control the spend.

    This adds value by enabling realistic testing of purchase or subscription flows in a safe, reversible way. Testers can fully experience the checkout or payment process, and you gain insight into any payment-related issues, all while avoiding fraudulent charges or reimbursements complexities. Privacy.com essentially sandboxes financial transactions for testing purposes.


    Rainforest QA

    Primary role: QA testing

    Rainforest QA is a QA testing platform that blends automation with human crowdtesting, which can be very useful during a beta. It allows you to create tests (even in plain English, no-code steps) that can be run on-demand by a combination of AI-driven automation and real human testers in the network. Rainforest QA is a comprehensive QA-as-a-service platform that blends managed and on-demand services from QA experts with an all-in-one testing platform. 

    In the context of beta testing, you might use Rainforest QA to perform repetitive regression tests or to have additional manual testers run through test cases on various devices beyond your core beta user group. For example, if you release a new beta build, Rainforest can automatically execute all your critical user flows (login, checkout, etc.) across different browsers or mobile devices, catching bugs early. Its crowd testers are available 24/7, so you get results quickly (often in minutes).

    The value Rainforest QA adds is confidence and coverage, it extends your beta testing by ensuring that both the intended test cases and exploratory tests are thoroughly covered, without solely relying on volunteered user feedback. It’s like having an on-demand QA team supporting your beta, which helps ensure you don’t overlook critical issues before release.


    BrowserStack

    Primary role: Access to devices and browsers for testing

    Cross-browser and cross-device compatibility is a common concern in beta testing, especially for web applications and responsive mobile web apps. BrowserStack is a cloud-based testing platform that provides instant access to thousands of real devices and browsers for testing.

    With BrowserStack, a beta tester or QA engineer can quickly check how a site or app performs on, say, an older Android phone with Chrome, the latest iPhone with Safari, Internet Explorer on Windows, etc., all through the cloud. During beta, you can use this to reproduce bugs that users report on specific environments or to proactively test your app’s compatibility.

    The value of BrowserStack in beta testing is its breadth of coverage, it helps ensure that your product works for all users by letting you test on almost any device/OS combination without maintaining a physical device lab. This leads to a smoother experience for beta users on different platforms and fewer surprise issues at launch.


    Jira

    Primary role: Feedback and bug management

    While not a testing tool per se, Jira is a critical tool for managing the findings from beta testing. Developed by Atlassian, Jira is widely used for bug and issue tracking in software projects. 

    In the context of beta testing, when feedback and bug reports start flowing in (via emails, Instabug, BetaTesting platform, etc.), you’ll need to triage and track these issues to resolution. Jira provides a centralized place to log each bug or suggestion, prioritize it, assign it to developers, and monitor its status through to fix and deployment. It integrates with many of the other tools (for example, Instabug or Rainforest can directly create Jira tickets for bugs).

    The value Jira adds to beta testing is organization and accountability, it ensures every critical issue discovered in beta is documented and not forgotten, and it helps the development team collaborate efficiently on addressing the feedback. With agile boards, sprint planning, and reporting, Jira helps turn the raw insights from a beta test into actionable tasks that lead to a better product launch.

    Now check out the Top 5 Beta Testing Companies Online


    Conclusion

    Beta testing is a multifaceted process, and these ten tools collectively cover the spectrum of needs to make a beta program successful.From recruiting real users (BetaTesting) and distributing builds (TestFlight, Firebase App Distribution), to gathering feedback and bugs (Instabug, Lookback) and ensuring test coverage (Rainforest QA, BrowserStack), and finally rewarding testers (Tremendous, Privacy.com) and tracking issues (Jira) each tool adds distinct value. Selecting the right combination of tools for your beta will depend on your product and team.

    By leveraging these tools, product managers, researchers, and engineers can significantly improve the effectiveness of beta testing, ultimately leading to a smoother launch with a product that’s been truly vetted by real users.

    The result is greater confidence in your product’s quality and a higher likelihood of delighting customers from day one. Each of these top beta testing tools plays a part in that success, helping teams launch better products through the power of thorough testing and user feedback.


    Have questions? Book a call in our call calendar.

  • AI vs. User Researcher: How to Add More Value than a Robot

    The rise of artificial intelligence is shaking up every field, and user research is no exception. Large language models (LLMs) and AI-driven bots are now able to transcribe sessions, analyze feedback, simulate users, and even conduct basic interviews. It’s no wonder many UX researchers are asking, “Is AI going to take my job?” There’s certainly buzz around AI interviewers that can chat with users 24/7, and synthetic users: AI-generated personas that simulate user behavior.

    A recent survey found 77% of UX researchers are already using AI in some part of their work, signaling that AI isn’t just coming, it’s already here in the user research. But while AI is transforming how we work, the good news is that it doesn’t have to replace you as a user researcher.

    In this article, we’ll explore how user research is changing, why human researchers still have the edge, and how you can thrive (not just survive) by adding more value than a robot.

    Here’s what we will explore:

    1. User Research Will Change (But Not Disappear)
    2. Why AI Won’t Replace the Human Researcher (The Human Touch)
    3. Evolve or Fade: Adapting Your Role in the Age of AI
    4. Leverage AI as Your Superpower, Not Your Replacement
    5. Thrive with AI, Don’t Fear It

    User Research Will Change (But Not Disappear)

    AI is quickly redefining the way user research gets done. Rather than wiping out research roles, it’s automating tedious chores and unlocking new capabilities. Think about tasks that used to gobble up hours of a researcher’s time: transcribing interview recordings, sorting through survey responses, or crunching usage data. Today, AI tools can handle much of this heavy lifting in a fraction of the time:

    • Automated transcription and note-taking: Instead of frantically scribbling notes, researchers can use AI transcription services (e.g. Otter.ai or built-in tools in platforms like Dovetail) to get near-instant, accurate transcripts of user interviews. Many of these tools even generate initial summaries or highlight reels of key moments.
    • Speedy analysis of mountains of data: AI excels at sifting through large datasets. It can summarize interviews, cluster survey answers by theme, and flag patterns much faster than any person. For example, an AI might analyze thousands of open-ended responses and instantly group them into common sentiments or topics, saving you from manual sorting.
    • Content generation and research prep: Need a draft of a research plan or a list of interview questions? Generative AI can help generate first drafts of discussion guides, survey questions, or test tasks for you to refine.
    • Simulated user feedback: Emerging tools even let you conduct prototype tests with AI-simulated users. For instance, some AI systems predict where users might click or get confused in a design, acting like “virtual users” for quick feedback. This can reveal obvious usability issues early on (though it’s not a replacement for testing with real people, as we’ll discuss later).
    • AI-assisted reporting: When it’s time to share findings, AI can help draft research reports or create data visualizations. ChatGPT and similar models are “very good at writing”, so they can turn bullet-point insights into narrative paragraphs or suggest ways to visualize usage data. This can speed up the reporting process – just be sure to fact-check and ensure sensitive data isn’t inadvertently shared with public AI services.

    In short, AI is revolutionizing parts of the UX research workflow. It’s making research faster, scaling it up, and freeing us from busywork. By automating data collection and analysis, AI enhances productivity, freeing up a researcher’s time” to focus on deeper analysis and strategic work. And it’s not just hype: companies are already taking advantage.

    According to Greylock, by using an AI interviewer, a team can scale from a dozen user interviews a week to 20+ without adding staff. Larger organizations aren’t cutting their research departments either, they’re folding AI into their research stack to cover more ground. These teams still run traditional studies, but use AI to “accelerate research in new markets (e.g. foreign languages), spin up projects faster, and increase overall velocity”, all without expanding team size. In both cases, AI is not just replacing work, it’s expanding the scope and frequency of research. What used to be a quarterly study might become a continuous weekly insight stream when AI is picking up the slack.

    The bottom line: User research isn’t disappearing – it’s evolving. Every wave of new tech, from cloud collaboration to remote testing platforms, has changed how we do research, but never why we do it. AI is simply the latest step in that evolution. In the age of AI, the core mission of UX research remains at vital as ever: understanding real users to inform product design. The methods will be more efficient, and the scale might be greater, but human-centered insight is still the goal.

    Check it out: We have a full article on AI User Feedback: Improving AI Products with Human Feedback


    Why AI Won’t Replace the Human Researcher (The Human Touch)

    So if AI can do all these incredible things, transcribe, analyze, simulate, what’s left for human researchers to do? The answer: all the most important parts. The truth is that AI lacks the uniquely human qualities that make user researchers invaluable. It’s great at the “what,” but struggles with the “why.”

    Here are a few critical areas where real user researchers add value that robots can’t:

    • Empathy and Emotional Intelligence:  At its core, user research is about understanding people: their feelings, motivations, frustrations. AI can analyze sentiment or detect if a voice sounds upset, but it “can’t truly feel what users feel”. Skilled researchers excel at picking up tiny cues in body language or tone of voice. We notice when a participant’s voice hesitates or their expression changes, even if they don’t verbalize a problem.

      There’s simply no substitute for sitting with a user, hearing the emotion in their stories, and building a human connection. This empathy lets us probe deeper and adjust on the fly, something an algorithm following a script won’t do.
    • Contextual and Cultural Understanding: Users don’t operate in a vacuum; their behaviors are shaped by context: their environment, culture, and personal experiences. An AI bot might see a pattern (e.g. many people clicked the wrong button), but currently struggles to grasp the context behind it. Maybe those users were on a noisy subway using one hand, or perhaps a cultural norm made them reluctant to click a certain icon.

      Human researchers have the contextual awareness to ask the right follow-up questions and interpret why something is happening. We understand nuances like cultural communication styles (e.g. how a Japanese user may be too polite to criticize a design openly) and we can adapt our approach accordingly. AI, at least in its current form, can’t fully account for these subtleties.
    • Creativity and Critical Thinking: Research often involves open-ended problem solving, from designing clever study methodologies to synthesizing disparate findings into a new insight. AI is brilliant at pattern-matching but not at original thinking. It “struggles to think outside the box”, whereas a good researcher can connect dots in novel ways. We generate creative questions on the spot, improvise new tests when something unexpected happens, and apply judgement to identify what truly matters. The human intuition that sparks an “aha” moment or a breakthrough idea is not something you can automate.
    • Communication and Storytelling: One of the most important roles of a UX researcher is translating data into a compelling story for the team. We don’t just spit out a report; we tailor the message to the audience, provide rich examples, and persuade stakeholders to take action. Sure, an AI can produce a neatly formatted report or slide deck. But can it step into a meeting, read the room, and inspire the team to empathize with users?

      The art of evangelizing user insights throughout an organization – getting that engineer to feel the user’s pain, or that executive to rethink a strategy after hearing a user quote relies on human communication skills.
    • Ethics and Trust: User research frequently delves into personal, sensitive topics. Participants need to trust the researcher to handle their information with care and empathy. Human researchers can build rapport and know when to pause or change approach if someone becomes uncomfortable. An AI interviewer, on the other hand, has no lived experience to guide empathy: it will just keep following its protocol.

      Ethical judgement, i.e. knowing how to ask tough questions sensitively, or deciding when not to pursue a line of questioning remains a human strength. Moreover, over-relying on AI can introduce risks of bias or false confidence in findings. AI might sometimes give answers that sound authoritative but are misleading if taken out of context. It takes a human researcher to validate and ensure insights are genuinely true, not just fast.

    In summary, user research is more than data, it’s about humans. You can automate the data collection and number crunching, but you can’t automate the human understanding. AI might detect that users are frustrated at a certain step, but it won’t automatically know why, nor will it feel that frustration the way you can. And importantly, it “cannot replicate the surprises and nuances” that real users bring. Those surprises are often where the game-changing insights lie. 

    “The main reason to conduct user research is to be surprised”, veteran researcher Jakob Nielsen reminds us. If we ever tried to rely solely on simulated or average user behavior, we’d miss those curveballs that lead to real innovation. That’s why Nielsen believes replacing humans in user research is one of the few areas that’s likely to be impossible forever.

    User research needs real users. AI can be a powerful assistant, but it’s not a wholesale replacement for the human researcher or the human user.


    Evolve or Fade: Adapting Your Role in the Age of AI

    Given that AI is here to stay, the big question is how to thrive as a user researcher in this new landscape. History has shown that when new technologies emerge, those who adapt and leverage the tools tend to advance, while those who stick stubbornly to old ways risk falling behind.

    Consider the analogy of global outsourcing: years ago, companies could hire cheaper labor abroad for various tasks, sparking fears that many jobs would vanish. And indeed, some routine work did get outsourced. But many professionals kept their jobs, and even grew more valuable, by being better than the cheaper alternative. They offered local context, higher quality, and unique expertise that generic outsourced labor couldn’t match. The same can apply now with AI as the “cheaper alternative.” If parts of user research become automated or simulated, you need to make sure your contribution goes beyond what the automation can do. In other words, double down on the human advantages we outlined earlier (empathy, context, creativity, interpretation) and let the AI handle the repetitive grunt work.

    The reality is that some researchers who fail to adapt may indeed see their roles diminished. For example, if a researcher’s job was solely to conduct straightforward interviews and write basic reports, a product team might conclude that an AI interviewer and auto-generated report can cover the basics. Those tasks alone might not justify a full-time role in the future. However, other researchers will find themselves moving into even more impactful (and higher-paid) positions by leveraging AI.

    By embracing AI tools, a single researcher can now accomplish what used to take a small team: analyzing more data, running more studies, and delivering insights faster. This means researchers who are proficient with AI can drive more strategic value. They can focus on synthesizing insights, advising product decisions, and tackling complex research questions, rather than toiling over transcription or data cleanup. In essence, AI can elevate the role of the user researcher to be more about strategy and leadership of research, and less about manual execution. Those who ride this wave will be at the cutting edge of a user research renaissance, often becoming the go-to experts who guide how AI is integrated ethically and effectively into the process. And companies will pay a premium for researchers who can blend human insight with AI-powered scale.

    It’s also worth noting that AI is expanding the reach of user research, not just threatening it. When research becomes faster and cheaper, more teams start doing it who previously wouldn’t. Instead of skipping research due to cost or time, product managers and designers are now able to do quick studies with AI assistance. The result can be a greater appreciation for research overall – and when deeper issues arise, they’ll still call in the human experts. The caveat is that the nature of the work will change. You might be overseeing AI-driven studies, curating and validating AI-generated data, and then doing the high-level synthesis and storytelling. The key is to position yourself as the indispensable interpreter and strategist.


    Leverage AI as Your Superpower, Not Your Replacement

    To thrive in the age of AI, become a user research who uses AI – not one who completes with it. The best way to add more value than a robot is to partner with the robots and amplify your impact. Here are some tips for how and when to use AI in your user research practice:

    • Use AI to do more, faster – then add your expert touch. Take advantage of AI tools to handle the labor-intensive phases of research. For example, let an AI transcribe and even auto-tag your interview recordings to give you a head start on analysis. You can then review those tags and refine them using your domain knowledge.

      If you have hundreds of survey responses, use an AI to cluster themes and pull out commonly used phrases. Then dig into those clusters yourself to understand the nuances and pick illustrative quotes. The AI will surface the “what”; you bring the “why” and the judgement. This way, you’re working smarter, not harder – covering more ground without sacrificing quality.
    • Know when to trust AI and when to double-check. AI can sometimes introduce biases or errors, especially if it’s trained on non-representative data or if it “hallucinates” an insight that isn’t actually supported by the data. Treat AI outputs as first drafts or suggestions, not gospel truth. For instance, if a synthetic user study gives you a certain finding, treat it as a hypothesis to validate with real users – not a conclusion to act on blindly.

      As Nielsen Norman Group advises“supplement, don’t substitute” AI-generated research for real research. Always apply your critical thinking to confirm that insights make sense in context. Think of AI as a junior analyst: very fast and tireless, but needing oversight from a human expert.
    • Employ AI in appropriate research phases. Generative AI “participants” can be handy for early-stage exploration – for example, to get quick feedback on a design concept or to generate personas that spark empathy in a pinch. They are useful for desk research and hypothesis generation, where “fake research” might be better than no research to get the ball rolling.

      However, don’t lean on synthetic users for final validation or high-stakes decisions. They often give “shallow or overly favorable feedback” and lack the unpredictable behaviors of real humans. Use them to catch low-hanging issues or to brainstorm questions, then bring in real users for the rigorous testing. Similarly, an AI interviewer (moderator) can conduct simple user interviews at scale: useful for collecting a large volume of feedback quickly, or reaching users across different time zones and languages. For research that requires deep probing or sensitive conversations, you’ll likely still want a human touch. Mix methods thoughtfully, using AI where it provides efficiency, and humans where nuance is critical.
    • Continue developing uniquely human skills. To add more value than a robot, double-down on the skills that make you distinctly effective. Work on your interview facilitation and observation abilities – e.g., reading body language, making participants comfortable enough to open up, and asking great follow-up questions. These are things an AI can’t easily replicate, and they lead to insights an AI can’t obtain.

      Similarly, hone your storytelling and visualization skills to communicate research findings in a persuasive way within your organization. The better you are at converting data into understanding and action, the more indispensable you become. AI can crunch numbers, but “it can’t sit across from a user and feel the ‘aha’ moment”, and it can’t rally a team around that “aha” either. Make sure you can.
    • Stay current with AI advancements (and limitations). AI technologies will continue to improve, so a thriving researcher keeps up with the trends. Experiment with new tools – whether it’s an AI that can analyze video recordings for facial expressions, or a platform that integrates chatGPT into survey analysis and see how they might fit into your toolkit. At the same time, keep an eye on where AI still falls short.

      For example, today’s language models still struggle to analyze visual behavior or complex multi-step interactions reliably. Those are opportunities for you to step in. Understanding what AI can and cannot do for research helps you strategically allocate tasks between you and the machine. Being knowledgeable about AI also positions you as a forward-thinking leader in your team, able to guide decisions about which tools to adopt and how to use them responsibly.

    By integrating AI into your workflow, you essentially become what Jakob Nielsen calls a “human-AI symbiont,”where “any decent researcher will employ a profusion of AI tools to augment skills and improve productivity.” Rather than being threatened by the “robot,” you are collaborating with the robot. This not only makes your work more efficient, but also more impactful – freeing you to engage in higher-level research activities that truly move the needle.

    Check it out: We have a full article on Recruiting Humans for AI User Feedback


    Conclusion: Thrive with AI, Don’t Fear It

    The age of AI, synthetic users, and robot interviewers is upon us, but this doesn’t spell doom for the user researcher – far from it. User research will change, but it will continue to thrive with you at the helm, so long as you adapt. Remember that “UX without real-user research isn’t UX”, and real users need human researchers to understand them. Your job is to ensure you’re bringing the human perspective that no AI can replicate, while leveraging AI for what it does do well. If you can master that balance, you’ll not only survive this AI wave, you’ll ride it to new heights in your career.

    In practical terms: embrace AI as your assistant, not your replacement. Let it turbocharge your workflow, extend your reach, and handle the drudge work, but keep yourself firmly in the driver’s seat when it comes to insight, empathy, and ethical judgment.

    The only researchers who truly lose out will be those who refuse to adapt or who try to complete with AI on tasks that AI does better. Don’t be that person. Instead, focus on adding value that a robot cannot: be the researcher who understands the why behind the data, who can connect with users on a human level, and who can turn research findings into stories and strategies that drive product success.

    Finally, take heart in knowing that the essence of our profession is safe. By reframing our unique value-add and wielding AI as a tool, user researchers can not only survive the AI revolution, but lead the way in a new era of smarter, more scalable, and still deeply human-centered research.

    In the end, AI won’t replace you – but a user researcher who knows how to harness AI just might. So make sure that researcher is you.


    Have questions? Book a call in our call calendar.

  • Crowdsourced Testing: When and How to Leverage Global Tester Communities

    Crowdsourced Testing to the Rescue:

    Imagine preparing to launch a new app or feature and wanting absolute confidence it will delight users across various devices and countries. Crowdsourced testing can make this a reality. In simple terms, crowdtesting is a software testing approach that leverages a community of independent testers. Instead of relying solely on an in-house QA team, companies tap into an on-demand crowd of real people who use their own devices in real environments to test the product. In other words, it adds fresh eyes and a broad range of perspectives to your testing process, beyond what a traditional QA lab can offer.

    In today’s fast-paced, global market, delivering a high-quality user experience is paramount. Whether you need global app testing, in-home product testing, or user-experience feedback, crowdtesting can be the solution. By tapping into a large community of testers, organizations can get access to a broader spectrum of feedback, uncovering elusive issues and enabling more accurate real-world user testing. Issues that might slip by an internal team (due to limited devices, locations, or biases) can be caught by diverse testers who mirror your actual user base.

    In short, crowdsourced testing helps ensure your product works well for everyone, everywhere – a crucial advantage for product managers, engineers, user researchers, and entrepreneurs alike. In the sections below, we’ll explore how crowdtesting differs from traditional QA, its key benefits (from real-world feedback to cost and speed), when to leverage it, tips on choosing a platform (including why many turn to BetaTesting), how to run effective crowdtests, and the challenges to watch out for.

    Here’s what we will explore:

    1. Crowdsourced Testing vs. Traditional QA
    2. Key Benefits of Crowdsourced Testing
    3. When Should You Use Crowdsourced Testing?
    4. Choosing a Crowdsourced Testing Platform (What to Look For)
    5. Running Effective Crowdsourced Tests and Managing Results
    6. Challenges of Crowdsourced Testing and How to Address Them

    Crowdsourced Testing vs. Traditional QA

    Crowdsourced testing isn’t meant to completely replace a dedicated QA team, but it does fill important gaps that traditional testing can’t always cover. The fundamental difference lies in who is doing the testing and how they do it:

    • Global, diverse testers vs. in-house team: Traditional in-house QA involves a fixed team of testers (or an outsourced team) often working from one location. By contrast, crowdtesting gives you a global pool of testers with different backgrounds, languages, and devices. This means your product is checked under a wide range of real-world conditions. For example, a crowdtesting company can provide testers on different continents and carriers to see how your app performs on various networks and locales – something an in-house team might struggle with.
    • On-demand scalability vs. fixed capacity: In-house QA teams have a set headcount and limited hours, so scaling up testing for a tight deadline or a big release can be slow and costly (hiring and training new staff). Crowdsourced testing, on the other hand, is highly flexible and scalable – you can ramp up the number of testers in days or even hours. Need overnight testing or a hundred extra testers for a weekend? The crowd is ready, thanks to time zone coverage and sheer volume.
    • Real devices & environments vs. lab setups: Traditional QA often uses a controlled lab environment with a limited set of devices and browsers. Crowdsourced testers use their own devices, OS versions, and configurations in authentic environments (home, work, different network conditions). This helps uncover device-specific bugs or usability issues that lab testing might miss.

      As an example, testing with real users in real environments may reveal that your app crashes on a specific older Android model or that a website layout breaks on a popular browser under certain conditions – insights you might not get without that diversity.
    • Fresh eyes and user perspective vs. product familiarity: In-house testers are intimately familiar with the product and test scripts, which is useful but can also introduce blind spots. Crowdsourced testers approach the product like real users seeing it for the first time. They are less biased by knowing how things “should” work. This outsider perspective can surface UX problems or assumptions that internal teams might gloss over.

    It’s worth noting that traditional QA still has strengths – for example, in-house teams have deep product knowledge and direct communication with developers. The best strategy is often to combine in-house and crowdtesting to get the benefits of both. Crowdsourced testing excels at broad coverage, speed, and real-world realism, while your core QA team can focus on strategic testing and integrating results. Many organizations use crowdtesting to augment their QA, not necessarily replace it.

    Natural Language Processing (NLP) is one of the AI terms startups need to know. Check out the rest here in this article: Top 10 AI Terms Startups Need to Know


    Key Benefits of Crowdsourced Testing

    Now let’s dive into the core benefits of crowdtesting and why it’s gaining popularity across industries. In essence, it offers three major advantages over traditional QA models: real-world user feedbackspeed, and cost-effectiveness(along with scalability as a bonus benefit). Here’s a closer look at each:

    • Authentic, Real-World Feedback: One of the biggest draws of crowdtesting is getting unbiased input from real users under real-world conditions. Because crowd testers come from outside your company and mirror your target customers, they will use your product in ways you might not anticipate. This often reveals usability issues, edge-case bugs, or cultural nuances that in-house teams can overlook.

      For instance, a crowd of testers in different countries can flag localization problems or confusing UI elements that a homogeneous internal team might miss. In short, crowdtesting helps ensure your product is truly user-friendly and robust in the wild, not just in the lab.
    • Faster Testing Cycles and Time-to-Market: Crowdsourced testing can dramatically accelerate your QA process. With a distributed crowd, you can get testing done 24/7 and in parallel. While your office QA team sleeps, someone on the other side of the world could be finding that critical bug. Many crowd platforms let you start a test and get results within days or even hours.

      For example, you might send a build to the crowd on Friday and have a full report by Monday. This round-the-clock, parallel execution leads to “faster test cycles”, enabling quicker releases. Faster feedback loops mean bugs are found and fixed sooner, preventing delays. In an era of continuous delivery and CI/CD, this speed is a game-changer for product teams racing to get updates out.
    • Cost Savings and Flexibility: Cost is a consideration for every team, and crowdtesting can offer significant savings. Instead of maintaining a large full-time QA staff (with salaries, benefits, and idle time between releases), crowdtesting lets you pay only for what you use. Need a big test cycle this month and none next month? With a crowd platform, that’s no problem – you’re not carrying unutilized resources. Additionally, you don’t have to invest in an extensive device lab; the crowd already has thousands of device/OS combinations at their disposal.

      Many platforms also offer flexible pricing models (per bug, per test cycle, or subscription tiers) so you can choose what makes sense for your budget and project needs. And don’t forget the savings from catching issues early – every major bug found before launch can save huge costs (and reputation damage) compared to fixing it post-release.
    • Scalability and Coverage: (Bonus Benefit) Along with the above, crowdtesting inherently brings scalability and broad coverage. Want to test on 50 different device models or across 10 countries? You can scale up a crowd test to cover that, which would be infeasible for most internal teams to replicate. This elasticity means you can handle peak testing demands(say, right before a big launch or during a holiday rush) without permanently enlarging your team. And when the crunch is over, you scale down.

      The large number of testers also means you can run many test cases simultaneously, shortening the overall duration of test cycles. All of this contributes to getting high-quality products to market faster without compromising on coverage.

    By leveraging these benefits – real user insight, quick turnaround, and lower costs – companies can iterate faster and release with greater confidence.

    Check it out: We have a full article on AI-Powered User Research: Fraud, Quality & Ethical Questions


    When Should You Use Crowdsourced Testing?

    Crowdtesting can be used throughout the software development lifecycle, but there are certain scenarios where it adds especially high value. Here are a few key times to leverage global tester communities:

    Before Major Product Launches or Updates: A big product launch is high stakes – any critical bug that slips through could derail the release or sour users’ first impressions. Crowdsourced testing is an ideal pre-launch safety net. It complements your in-house QA by providing an extra round of broad, real-world testing right when it matters most. You can use the crowd to perform regression tests on new features (ensuring you didn’t break existing functionality), as well as exploratory testing to catch edge cases your team didn’t think of. The result is a smoother launch with far fewer surprises.

    By getting crowd testers to assess new areas of the application that may not have been considered by the internal QA team, you minimize the risk of a show-stopping bug on day one. In short, if a release is mission-critical, crowdtesting it beforehand can be a smart insurance policy.

    Global Rollouts and Localization: When expanding your app or service to new markets and regions, local crowdtesters are invaluable. They can verify that your product works for their locale – from language translations to regional network infrastructure and cultural expectations. Sometimes, text might not fit after translation, or an image might be inappropriate in another culture. Rather than finding out only after you’ve launched in that country, you can catch these issues early. For example, one crowdtesting case noted,

    If you translate a phrase and the text doesn’t fit a button or if some imagery is culturally off, the crowd will find it, preventing embarrassing mistakes that could be damaging to your brand.”

    Likewise, testers across different countries can ensure your payment system works with local carriers/banks, or that your website complies with local browsers and devices. Crowdsourced testing is essentially on-demand international QA – extremely useful for global product managers.

    Ongoing Beta Programs and Early Access: If you run a beta program or staged rollout (where a feature is gradually released to a subset of users), crowdtesting can supplement these efforts. You might use a crowd community as your beta testers instead of (or in addition to) soliciting random users. The advantage is that crowdtesters are usually more organized in providing feedback and following test instructions, and you can NDA them if needed.

    Using a crowd for beta testing helps minimize risk to live users – you find and fix problems in a controlled beta environment before full release.  In practice, many companies will first roll out a new app version to crowdtesters (or a small beta group) to catch major bugs, then proceed to the app store or production once it’s stable. This approach protects your brand reputation and user experience by catching issues early.

    When You Need Specific Target Demographics or Niche Feedback: There are times you might want feedback from a very specific group – say, parents with children of a certain age testing an educational app, or users of a particular competitor product, or people in a certain profession. Crowdsourced testing platforms often allow detailed tester targeting (age, location, occupation, device type, etc.), so you can get exactly the kind of testers you need. For instance, you might recruit only enterprise IT admins to test a B2B software workflow, or only hardcore gamers to test a gaming accessory.

    The crowd platform manages finding these people for you from their large pool. This is extremely useful for user research or UX feedback from your ideal customer profile, which traditional QA teams can’t provide. Essentially, whenever you find yourself saying “I wish I could test this with [specific user type] before we go live,” that’s a cue that crowdtesting could help.

    Augmenting QA during Crunch Times: If your internal QA team is small or swamped, crowdsourced testers can offload repetitive or time-consuming tests and free your team to focus on critical areas. During crunch times – like right before a deadline or when a sudden urgent patch is needed – bringing in crowdtesters ensures nothing slips through the cracks due to lack of time. You get a burst of extra testing muscle exactly when you need it, without permanently increasing headcount.

    In summary, crowdtesting is especially useful for high-stakes releases, international launches, beta testing phases, and scaling your QA effort on demand. It’s a flexible tool in your toolkit – you might not need it for every minor update, but when the situation calls for broad, real-world coverage quickly, the crowd is hard to beat.

    Check it out: We have a full article on AI User Feedback: Improving AI Products with Human Feedback


    Choosing a Crowdsourced Testing Platform (What to Look For)

    If you’ve decided to leverage crowdsourced testing, the next step is choosing how to do it. You could try to manually recruit random testers via forums or social media, but that’s often hit-or-miss and hard to manage. The efficient approach is to use a crowdtesting platform or service that has an established community of testers and tools to manage the process.

    There are several well-known platforms in this space – including BetaTesting, Applause (uTest), Testlio, Global App Testing, Ubertesters, Testbirds, and others – each with their own strengths. Here are some key factors to consider when choosing a platform:

    • Community Size and Diversity: Look at how large and diverse the tester pool is. A bigger community (in the hundreds of thousands) means greater device coverage and faster recruiting. Diversity in geography, language, and demographics is important if you need global feedback. For instance, BetaTesting boasts a community of over 450,000 participants around the world that you can choose from. That scale can be very useful when you need lots of testers quickly or very specific targeting.

      Check if the platform can reach your target user persona – e.g., do they have testers in the right age group, country, industry, etc. Many platforms allow filtering testers by criteria like gender, age, location, device type, interests, and more.
    • Tester Quality and Vetting: Quantity is good, but quality matters too. You want a platform that ensures testers are real, reliable, and skilled. Look for services that vet their community – for example real non-anonymous, ID-verified and vetted participants. Some platforms have rating systems for testers, training programs, or certifications with smaller pools of testers.

      Read reviews or case studies to gauge if the testers on the platform tend to provide high-quality bug reports and feedback. A quick check on G2 or other review sites can reveal a lot about quality.
    • Types of Testing Supported: Consider what kinds of tests you need and whether the platform supports them. Common offerings include functional bug testing, usability testing (often via video think-alouds), beta testing over multiple days or weeks, exploratory testing, localization testing, load testing (with many users simultaneously), and more. Make sure the service you choose aligns with your test objectives. If you need moderated user interviews or very specific scenarios, check if they accommodate that.
    • Platform and Tools: A good crowdtesting platform will provide a dashboard or interface for you to define test cases, communicate with testers, and receive results (bug reports, feedback, logs, etc.) in an organized way. It should integrate with your workflow – for example, pushing bugs directly into your tracker (JIRA, Trello, etc.) and supporting attachments like screenshots or videos. Look for features like real-time reporting, automated summary of results, and perhaps AI-assisted analysis of feedback. A platform with good reporting and analytics can save you a lot of time when interpreting the test outcomes.
    • Support and Engagement Model: Different platforms offer different levels of service. Some are more self-service – you post your test and manage it yourself. Others offer managed services where a project manager helps design tests, selects testers, and ensures quality results. Decide what you need. If you’re new to crowdtesting or short on time, a managed service might be worth it (they handle the heavy lifting of coordination).

      BetaTesting, for example, provides support services that can be tailored from self-serve up to fully managed, depending on your needs. Also consider the responsiveness of the platform’s support team, and whether they provide guidance on best practices.
    • Security and NDA options: Since you might be exposing pre-release products to external people, check what confidentiality measures are in place. Reputable platforms will allow you to require NDAs with testers and have data protection measures. If you have a very sensitive application, you might choose a smaller closed group of testers (some platforms let you invite your own users into a private crowd test, for example). Always inquire about how the platform vets testers for security and handles any private data or credentials you might share during testing.
    • Pricing: Finally, consider pricing models and ensure it fits your budget. Some platforms charge per tester or per bug, others have flat fees per test cycle or subscription plans. Clarify what deliverables you get (e.g., number of testers, number of test hours, types of reports) for the price.

      While cost is important, remember to focus on value– the cheapest option may not yield the best feedback, and a slightly more expensive platform with higher quality testers could save you money by catching costly bugs early. BetaTesting and several others are known to offer flexible plans for startups, mid-size, and enterprise, so explore those options.

    It often helps to do a trial run or pilot with one platform to evaluate the results. Many companies try a small test on a couple of platforms to see which provides better bugs or insights, then standardize on one. That said, the best platform for you will depend on your specific needs and which one aligns with them.

    Check it out: We have a full article on 8 Tips for Managing Beta Testers to Avoid Headaches & Maximize Engagement


    Running Effective Crowdsourced Tests and Managing Results

    Getting the most out of crowdsourced testing requires some planning and good management. While the crowd and platform will do the heavy lifting in terms of execution, you still play a crucial role in setting the test up for successand interpreting the outcomes. Here are some tips for launching effective tests and handling the results:

    1. Define clear objectives and scope: Before you start, be crystal clear on what you want to achieve with the test. Are you looking for general bug discovery on a new feature? Do you need usability feedback on a specific flow? Is this a full regression test of an app update? Defining the scope helps you create a focused test plan and avoids wasting testers’ time. Also decide on what devices or platforms must be covered and how many testers you need for each.
    2. Communicate expectations with detailed instructions: This point cannot be overstated – clear instructions will make or break your crowdtest. Write a test plan or scenario script for the testers, explaining exactly what they should do, what aspects to focus on, and how to report issues. The more context you provide, the better the feedback.

      Once you’ve selected your testers, clearly communicating your testing requirements is crucial. Provide detailed test plans, instructions, and criteria for reporting issues. This clarity helps ensure testers know exactly what is expected of them. Don’t assume testers will intuitively know your app – give them use cases (“try to sign up, then perform X task…” etc.), but also encourage exploration beyond the script to catch unexpected bugs. It’s a balance between guidance and allowing freedom to explore. Additionally, set criteria for bug reporting (e.g. what details to include, any template or severity rating system you want).
    3. Choose the right testers: If your platform allows you to select or approve testers same as BetaTesting does, take advantage of that. You might want people from certain countries or with certain devices for particular tests. Some platforms will auto-select a broad range for you, but if it’s a niche scenario, make sure to recruit accordingly. For example, if you’re testing a fintech app, you might prefer testers with experience in finance apps.

      On managed crowdtests, discuss with the provider about the profile of testers that would be best for your project. A smaller group of highly relevant testers can often provide more valuable feedback than a large generic group.
    4. Timing and duration: Decide how long the test will run. Short “bug hunt” cycles can be 1-2 days for quick feedback. Beta tests or usability studies might run over a week or more to gather longitudinal data. Make sure testers know the timeline and any milestones (for multi-day tests, perhaps you ask for an update or a survey each day). Also be mindful of time zone differences – posting a test on Friday evening U.S. time might get faster responses from testers in Asia over the weekend, for instance. Leverage the 24/7 nature of the crowd.
    5. Engage with testers during the test: Crowdsourced doesn’t mean hands-off. Be available to answer testers’ questions or clarify instructions if something is confusing. Many platforms have a forum or chat for each test where testers can ask questions. Monitoring that can greatly improve outcomes (e.g., if multiple testers are stuck at a certain step, you might realize your instructions were unclear and issue a clarification). If you choose the BetaTesting to run, you can use our integrated message feature to communicate directly with the testers.

      This also shows testers that you’re involved, which can motivate them to provide high-quality feedback. If a tester reports something interesting but you need more info, don’t hesitate to ask them for clarification or additional details during the test cycle.
    6. Reviewing and managing results: Once the results come in (usually in the form of bug reports, feedback forms, videos, etc.), it’s time to make sense of them. This can be overwhelming if you have dozens of reports, but a good platform will help aggregate and sort them. Triage the findings: identify the critical bugs that need immediate fixing, versus minor issues or suggestions. It’s often useful to have your QA lead or a developer go through the bug list and categorize by severity.

      Many crowdtesting platforms integrate with bug tracking tools – for example, BetaTesting can push bug reports directly to Jira with all the relevant data attached, which saves manual work. Ensure each bug is well-documented and reproducible; if something isn’t clear, you can often ask the tester for more info even after they submitted (through comments). For subjective feedback (like opinions on usability), look for common themes across testers – are multiple people complaining about the registration process or a particular feature? Those are areas to prioritize for improvement.
    7. Follow up and iteration: Crowdsourced testing can be iterative. After fixing the major issues from one round, you might run a follow-up test to verify the fixes or to delve deeper into areas that had mixed feedback. This agile approach, where you test, fix, and retest, can lead to a very polished final product.

      Also, consider keeping a group of trusted crowdtesters for future (some platforms let you build a custom tester team or community for your product). They’ll become more familiar with your product over time and can be even more effective in subsequent rounds.
    8. Closing the loop: Finally, it’s good practice to close out the test by thanking the testers and perhaps providing a brief summary or resolution on the major issues. Happy testers are more likely to engage deeply in your future tests. Some companies even share with the crowd community which bugs were the most critical that they helped catch (which can be motivating).

      Remember that crowdtesters are often paid per bug or per test, so acknowledge their contributions – it’s a community and treating them well ensures high-quality participation in the long run.

    By following these best practices, you’ll maximize the value of the crowdtesting process. Essentially, treat it as a collaboration: you set them up for success, and they deliver gold in terms of user insights and bug discoveries. With your results in hand, you can proceed to launch or iterate with much greater confidence in your product’s quality.

    Challenges of Crowdsourced Testing and How to Address Them

    Crowdtesting is powerful, but it’s not without challenges. Being aware of potential pitfalls allows you to mitigate them and ensure a smooth experience. Here are some key challenges and ways to address them:

    Confidentiality and Security: Opening up your pre-release product to external testers can raise concerns about leaks or sensitive data exposure. This is a valid concern – if you’re testing a highly confidential project, crowdsourcing might feel risky. 

    How to address it: Work with platforms that take security seriously. Many platforms also allow you to test with a smaller trusted group for sensitive apps, or even invite specific users (e.g., from your company or existing customer base) into the platform environment.

    Additionally, you can limit the data shared – use dummy data or test accounts instead of real user data during the crowdtest. If the software is extremely sensitive (e.g., pre-patent intellectual property), you might hold off on crowdsourcing that portion, or only use vetted professional testers under strict contracts.

    Variable Tester Quality and Engagement: Not every crowdtester will be a rockstar; some may provide shallow feedback or even make mistakes in following instructions. There’s also the possibility of testers rushing through to maximize earnings (if paid per bug, a minority might report trivial issues to increase count). 

    How to address it: Choose a platform with good tester reputation systems and, if possible, curate your tester group (pick those with high ratings or proven expertise). Provide clear instructions to reduce misunderstandings. It can help to have a platform/project manager triage incoming reports – often they will eliminate duplicate or low-quality bug reports before you see them.

    Also, structuring incentives properly (e.g., rewarding quality of bug reports, not sheer quantity) can lead to better outcomes. Some companies run a brief pilot test with a smaller crowd and identify which testers gave the best feedback, then keep those for the main test.

    Communication Gaps: Since you’re not in the same room as the testers, clarifying issues can take longer. Testers might misinterpret something or you might find a bug report unclear and have to ask for more info asynchronously. 

    How to address it: Use the platform’s communication tools – many have a comments section on each bug or a chat for the test cycle. Engage actively and promptly; this often resolves issues. Having a dedicated coordinator or QA lead on your side to interact with testers during the test can bridge the gap. Over time, as you repeat tests, communication will improve, especially if you often work with the same crowdtesters.

    Integration with Development Cycle: If your dev team is not used to external testing, there might be initial friction in incorporating crowdtesting results. For example, developers might question the validity of a bug that only one external person found on an obscure device. 

    How to address it: Set expectations internally that crowdtesting is an extension of QA. Treat crowd-found bugs with the same seriousness as internally found ones. If a bug is hard to reproduce, you can often ask the tester for additional details or attempt to reproduce via an internal emulator or device lab. Integrate the crowdtesting cycle into your sprints – e.g., schedule a crowdtest right after code freeze, so developers know to expect a batch of issues to fix. Making it part of the regular development rhythm helps avoid any perception of “random” outside input.

    Potential for Too Many Reports: Sometimes, especially with a large tester group, you might get hundreds of feedback items. While in general more feedback is better than less, it can be overwhelming to process. 

    How to address it: Plan for triage. Use tags or categories to sort bugs (many platforms let testers categorize bug types or severity). Have multiple team members review portions of the reports. If you get a lot of duplicate feedback (which can happen with usability opinions), that actually helps you gauge impact – frequent mentions mean it’s probably important. Leverage any tools the platform provides for summarizing results. For instance, some might give you a summary report highlighting the top issues. You can also ask the platform’s project manager to provide an executive summary if available.

    Not a Silver Bullet for All Testing: Crowdtesting is fantastic for finding functional bugs and getting broad feedback, but it might not replace specialized testing like deep performance tuning, extensive security penetration testing, or very domain-specific test cases that require internal knowledge. 

    How to address it: Use crowdtesting in conjunction with other QA methods. For example, you might use automation for performance tests, or have security experts for a security audit, and use crowdtesting for what it excels at (real user scenarios, device diversity, etc.). Understand its limits: if your app requires knowledge of internal algorithms or access to source code to test certain things, crowdsourced testers won’t have that context. Mitigate this by pairing crowd tests with an internal engineer who can run complementary tests in those areas.

    The good news is that many of these challenges can be managed with careful planning and the right partner. As with any approach, learning and refining your process will make crowdtesting smoother each time. Many companies have successfully integrated crowdtesting by establishing clear protocols – for instance, requiring all testers to sign NDAs, using vetted pools of testers for each product line, and scheduling regular communication checkpoints.

    By addressing concerns around confidentiality, reliability, and coordination (often with help from the platform itself), you can reap the benefits of the crowd while minimizing downsides. Remember that crowdtesting has been used by very security-conscious organizations as well – even banking and fintech companies – by employing best practices like NDA-bound invitation-only crowds. So the challenges are surmountable with the right strategy.


    Final Thoughts

    Crowdsourced testing is a powerful approach to quality assurance that, when used thoughtfully, can significantly enhance product quality and user satisfaction. It matters because it injects real-world perspective into the testing process, something increasingly important as products reach global and diverse audiences.

    Crowdtesting differs from traditional QA in its scalability, speed, breadth, offering benefits like authentic feedback, rapid results, and cost efficiency. It’s particularly useful at critical junctures like launches or expansions, and with the right platform (such as BetaTesting.com and others) and best practices, it can be seamlessly integrated into a team’s workflow. Challenges like security and communication can be managed with proper planning, as demonstrated by the many organizations successfully using crowdtesting today.

    For product managers, engineers, and entrepreneurs, the takeaway is that you’re not alone in the quest for quality – there’s a whole world of testers out there ready to help make your product better. Leveraging that global tester community can be the difference between a flop and a flawless user experience.

    As you plan your next product cycle, consider where “the power of the crowd” might give you the edge in QA. You might find that it not only improves your product, but also provides fresh insights and inspiration that elevate your team’s perspective on how real users interact with your creation. And ultimately, building products that real users love is what crowd testing is all about.


    Have questions? Book a call in our call calendar.

  • Global App Testing: Testing Your App, Software or Hardware Globally

    Why Does Global App Testing Matter?

    In today’s interconnected world, most software and hardware products are ultimately destined for global distribution. But frequently, these products are only tested in the lab or in the country in which it was manufactured, leading to bad user experiences, poor sales, and failed marketing campaigns.

    How do you solve this? With global app testing and product testing. Put your app, website, or physical product (e.g. TVs, streaming media devices, vacuums, etc) in the hands of users in each country it’s meant to be distributed.

    If you plan to launch your product globally (now or in the future), you need feedback and testing from around the world to ensure your product is technically stable and provides a great user experience.

    Here’s what we will explore:

    1. Why Does Global App Testing Matter?
    2. How to Find and Recruit the Right Testers
    3. How to Handle Logistics and Communication Across Borders
    4. Let the Global Insights Shape Your Product

    The benefits of having testers from multiple countries and cultures are vast:

    • Diverse Perspectives Uncover More Issues: Testers in different regions can reveal unique bugs and usability issues that stem from local conditions, whether it’s language translations breaking the UI, text rendering with unique languages, or payment workflows failing on a country-specific gateway. In other words, a global app testing pool helps ensure your app works for “everyone, everywhere.”
    • Cultural Insights Drive Better UX: Beyond technical bugs, global testers provide culturally relevant feedback. They might highlight if a feature is culturally inappropriate or if content doesn’t make sense in their context. Research shows that digital products built only for a local profile often flop abroad, simply because a design that succeeds at home can confuse users from a different culture.

      By beta testing internationally, you gather insights to adapt your product’s language, design, and features to each culture’s expectations. For example, a color or icon that appeals in one culture may carry a negative meaning in another; your global testers will call this out so you can adjust early.
    • Confidence in Global Readiness: Perhaps the biggest payoff of global beta testing is confidence. Knowing that real users on every continent have vetted your app means fewer nasty surprises at launch. You can be sure that your e-commerce site handles European privacy prompts correctly, your game’s servers hold up in Southeast Asia, or that your smart home device complies with voltage standards and user habits in each country. It’s far better to find and fix these issues in a controlled beta than after a worldwide rollout.

    That said, you don’t need to test in every country on the planet. 

    Choosing the right regions is key. Focus on areas aligned with your target audience and growth plans. Use data-driven tools (like Google’s Market Finder) to identify high-potential markets based on factors like mobile usage, revenue opportunities, popular payment methods, and localization requirements. For instance, if Southeast Asia or South America show a surge in users interested in your product category, those regions might be prime beta locales.

    Also, look at where you’re already getting traction. If you’ve released a soft launch or have early analytics, examine whether people in certain countries are already installing or talking about your app. If so, that market likely deserves inclusion in your beta. Google’s experts suggest checking if users in a region are already installing your app, using it, leaving feedback and talking about it on social media as a signal of where to focus. In practice, if you notice a spike of sign-ups from Brazil or discussions about your product on a German forum, consider running beta tests there, these engaged users can give invaluable localized feedback and potentially become your advocates.

    In summary, global app testing matters because it ensures your product is truly ready for a worldwide audience. It leverages the power of diversity, in culture, language, and tech environments to polish your app or device. You’ll catch region-specific issues, learn what delights or frustrates users in each market, and build a blueprint for a successful global launch. In the next sections, we’ll explore how to actually recruit those international testers and manage the logistics of testing across borders.

    Check it out: We have a full article on AI Product Validation With Beta Testing


    How to Find and Recruit the Right Testers Around the World

    Sourcing testers from around the world might sound daunting, but today there are many avenues to find them. The goal is to recruit people who closely resemble your target customers in each region, not just random crowds, but real users who fit your criteria. Here are some effective strategies to find and engage quality global testers:

    • Leverage beta testing platforms: Dedicated beta testing services like BetaTesting and similar platforms maintain large communities of global testers eager to try new products. For example, BetaTesting’s platform boasts a network of over 450,000 real-world participants across diverse demographics and over 200 countries, so teams can easily recruit testers that match their target audience.

      These platforms often handle a lot of heavy lifting, from participant onboarding to feedback collection, making it simpler to run a worldwide test. As a product manager, you can specify the countries, devices, or user profiles you need, and the platform will find suitable candidates. Beta platforms can give you fast access to an international pool.
    • Tap into online communities: Outside of official platforms, online communities and forums are fertile ground for finding enthusiastic beta testers worldwide. Think Reddit (which has subreddits for beta testing and country-specific communities), tech forums, Discord groups, or product enthusiast communities. A creative post or targeted ad campaign in regions you’re targeting can attract users who are interested in your domain (for example, posting in a German Android fan Facebook group if you need Android testers in Germany). Be sure to clearly explain the opportunity and any incentives (e.g. “Help us test our new app, get early access and a $20 gift card for your feedback”).

      Additionally, consider communities like BetaTesting’s own (they invite tech-savvy consumers to sign up as beta testers) where thousands of users sign up for testing opportunities. These communities often have built-in geo-targeting, you can request, say, 50 testers in Europe and 50 in Asia, and the community managers will handle the outreach.
    • Recruit from your user base: If you already have users or an email list in multiple countries (perhaps for an existing product or a previous campaign), don’t overlook them. In-app or in-product invitations can be highly effective because those people are already interested in your brand. For example, you might add a banner in your app or website for users in Canada and India saying, “We’re launching something new, sign up for our global beta program!” Often, your current users will be excited to join a beta for early access or exclusive benefits. Plus, they’ll provide very relevant feedback since they’re already somewhat familiar with your product ecosystem. (Just be mindful of not cannibalizing your production usage, make sure it’s clear what the beta is and perhaps target power-users who love giving feedback.)

    No matter which recruitment channels you use, screening and selecting the right testers is crucial. You’ll want to use geotargeting and screening surveys to pinpoint testers who meet your criteria. This is especially important when going global, where you may have specific requirements for each region. For instance, imagine you need testers in Japan who use iOS 16+, or gamers in France on a particular console, or families in Brazil with a smart home setup.

    Craft a screener survey that filters for those attributes (e.g. “What smartphone do you use? answer must be iPhone; What country do you reside in? must be Japan”). Many beta platforms provide advanced filtering tools to do this automatically. BetaTesting, for example, allows clients to filter and select testers based on hundreds of targeting criteria, from basics like age, gender, and location, to specifics like technology usage, hobbies, or profession. Use these tools or your own surveys to ensure you’re recruiting ideal testers (not just anybody with an internet connection).

    Also, coordinate the distribution of testers across devices and networks that matter to you. If your app is used on both low-end and high-end phones, or in both urban high-speed internet and rural 3G conditions, aim to include that variety in your beta pool. In the global context, this means if you’re testing a mobile app, try to get a spread of iPhones and Android models common in each country (remember that in some markets budget Android devices dominate, whereas in others many use the latest iPhone).

    Likewise, consider telecom networks, a beta for a streaming app might include testers on various carriers or internet speeds in each country to see how the experience holds up. Coordinating this distribution will give you confidence that your product performs well across the spectrum of devices, OS versions, and network conditions encountered globally.

    Finally, provide a fair incentive for participation. To recruit high-quality testers, especially busy professionals or niche users, you need to respect their time and effort. While some superfans might test for free, most formal global beta tests include a reward (monetary payments, gift cards, discounts, or exclusive perks are common).

    Offering reasonable incentives not only boosts sign-ups but also leads to more thoughtful feedback, as people feel their contribution is valued. On the flip side, being too stingy can backfire; you might only attract those looking for a quick payout rather than genuine testers. 

    In practice, consider the cost of living and typical income levels in each country when setting incentives. An amount that is motivating in one region might be trivial in another (or vice versa). When recruiting globally, “meaningful” might vary, e.g. $15 Amazon US gift card for a short test might be fine in the US, but you might choose a different voucher of equivalent value for testers in India or Nigeria. The key is to make it fair and culturally appropriate (some may prefer cash via PayPal or bank transfer, others might be happy with a local e-commerce gift card). We’ll discuss the logistics of distributing these incentives across borders next, which is its own challenge.

    Check it out: We have a full article on Giving Incentives for Beta Testing & User Research


    How to Handle Logistics and Communication Across Borders

    Running a global beta test isn’t just about finding testers, you also have to manage the logistics and communication so that the experience is smooth for both you and the participants. Different time zones, languages, payment systems, and even shipping regulations can complicate matters. With some planning and the right tools, however, you can overcome these hurdles. Let’s break down the main considerations:

    Incentives and Reward Payments Across Countries

    Planning how to deliver incentives or rewards internationally is one of the trickiest aspects of global testing. As noted, it’s standard to compensate beta testers (often with money or gift cards), but paying people in dozens of countries is not as simple as paying your neighbor. For one, not every country supports PayPal, the go-to payment method for many online projects. In fact, PayPal is unavailable in 28 countries as of recent counts, including sizable markets like Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Iran among others.

    Even where PayPal is available, testers may face high fees, setup hassles (e.g. difficult business paperwork required) or other issues. Other payment methods have their own regional limitations and regulations (for example, some countries restrict international bank transfers or require specific tax documentation for foreign payments).

    The prospect of figuring out a unique payment solution for each country can be overwhelming, and you probably don’t want to spend weeks navigating foreign banking systems. The good news is you don’t have to reinvent the wheel. We recommend using a provider like Tremendous (or similar global reward platforms) to facilitate reward distribution throughout the globe.

    What’s the solution? A global reward distribution platform. Platforms like Tremendous specialize in this: you fund a single account and they can send out rewards that are redeemable as gift cards, prepaid Visa cards, PayPal funds, or other local options to recipients in over 200 countries with just a few clicks. They also handle currency conversions and compliance, sparing you a lot of headaches. The benefit is two-fold: you ensure testers everywhere actually receive their reward in a usable form, and you save massive administrative time.

    Using a global incentive platform can dramatically streamline cross-border payments. The takeaway: a single integrated rewards platform lets you treat your global testers fairly and equally, without worrying about who can or cannot receive a PayPal payment. It’s a one-stop solution, you set the reward amount for each tester, and the platform handles delivering it in a form that works in their country.

    A few additional tips on incentives: Be transparent with testers about what reward they’ll get and when. Provide estimated timelines (e.g. “within 1 week of test completion”) and honor them, prompt payment helps build trust and keeps testers motivated. Also, consider using digital rewards (e.g. e-gift codes) which are easier across borders than physical items.

    And finally, keep an eye on fraud; unfortunately, incentives can attract opportunists. Requiring testers to verify identity or using a platform that flags suspicious behavior (Tremendous, for instance, has fraud checks built-in) will ensure you’re rewarding genuine participants only.

    Multilingual Communication and Support

    When testers are spread across countries, language becomes a key factor in effective communication. To get quality feedback, participants need to fully understand your instructions, and you need to understand their feedback. The best practice is to provide all study materials in each tester’s local language whenever possible.

    In countries where English isn’t the official language, you should translate your test instructions, tasks, and questions into the local tongue. Otherwise, you’ll drastically shrink the pool of people who can participate and risk getting poor data because testers struggle with a foreign language. For example, if you run a test in Spain, conduct it in Spanish, an English-only test in Spain would exclude many willing testers and impact the data quality and study results..

    On the feedback side, consider allowing testers to respond in their native language, too. Not everyone is comfortable writing long-form opinions in English, and you might get more nuanced insights if they can express themselves freely. You can always translate their responses after (either through services or modern AI translation tools which have gotten quite good).

    If running a moderated test (like live interviews or focus groups) in another language, hire interpreters or bilingual moderators. A local facilitator who speaks the language can engage with testers smoothly and catch cultural subtleties that an outsider might miss. This not only removes language barriers but also puts participants at ease, they’re likely to open up more to someone who understands their norms and can probe in culturally appropriate ways.

    For documentation, translate any key communications like welcome messages, instructions, and surveys. However, also maintain an English master copy internally so you can aggregate findings later. It’s helpful to have a native speaker review translations to avoid any awkward phrasing that could confuse testers.

    During the test, be ready to offer multilingual support: if a tester emails with a question in French, have someone who can respond in French (or use a translation tool carefully). Even simple things like providing customer support contacts or FAQs in the local language can significantly improve the tester experience.

    Another strategy for complex, multi-country projects is to appoint local project managers or coordinators for each region. This could be an employee or a partner who is on the ground, speaks the language, and knows the culture. They can handle on-the-spot issues, moderate discussions, and generally “translate” both language and cultural context between your central team and the local testers.

    For a multi-week beta or a hardware trial, a local coordinator can arrange things like shipping (as we’ll discuss next) and even host meet-ups or Q&A sessions in the local language. While it adds a bit of cost, it can drastically increase participant engagement and the richness of feedback, plus it shows respect to your testers that you invested in local support.

    Shipping Physical Products Internationally

    If you’re beta testing a physical product (say a gadget, IoT device, or any hardware), logistics get even more tangible: you need to get the product into testers’ hands across borders. Shipping hardware around the world comes with challenges like customs, import fees, longer transit times, and potential damage or loss in transit. Based on hard-earned experience, here are some tips to manage global shipping for a beta program:

    Ship from within each country if possible: If you have inventory available, try to dispatch products from a local warehouse or office in each target country/region. Domestic shipping is far simpler (no customs forms, minimal delays) and often cheaper. If you’re a large company with international warehouses, leverage them. If not, an alternative is the “hub and spoke” approach, bulk ship a batch of units to a trusted partner or team member within the region, and then have them forward individual units to testers in that country.

    For example, you could send one big box or pallet of devices to your team in France, who then distributes the packages locally to the testers in France. This avoids each tester’s package being stuck at customs or incurring separate import taxes when shipping packages individually.

    Use proven, high-quality shipping companies: We recommend using proven shipping services for overseas shipping (e..g think FedEx, DHL, UPS, GLS, DPD, etc). We also recommend using the fastest shipping method that is affordable. Most of these companies greatly simplify the complexity of dealing with international shipping regulations and customs definitions.

    Mind customs and regulations: When dealing with customs paperwork, do your homework on import rules and requirements and be sure to complete all the paperwork properly (this is where it helps to work with proven international shipping companies). Be sure when creating your shipment that you are paying for any import fees and the cost of shipping directly to your testers door. If your testers are required to pay out of pocket for duties / taxes / customs charges, you are going to run into major logistical issues.

    Provide tracking and communicate proactively: Assign each shipment a tracking number and share it with the respective tester (along with the courier site to track). Ideally, also link each tester’s email or phone to the shipment so the courier can send them updates directly. This way, testers know when to expect the package and can retrieve it if delivery is attempted when they’re out.

    Having tracking also gives you oversight; you can see if a package is delayed or stuck and intervene. Create a simple spreadsheet or use your beta platform to map which tester got which tracking number, this will be invaluable if something goes awry.

    Plan for returns (if needed): Decide upfront whether you need the products back at the end of testing. If yes, tell testers before they join that return shipping will be required after the beta period. Testers are usually fine with this as long as it’s clear and easy. To make returns painless, include a prepaid return shipping label in the box or send them one via email later. Arrange pickups if possible or instruct testers how to drop off the package.

    Using major international carriers like FedEx, DHL, or UPS can simplify return logistics, they have reliable cross-border services and you can often manage return labels from your home country account. If devices aren’t being returned (common for cheaper items or as an added incentive), be explicit that testers can keep the product, they’ll love that!

    Have a backup plan for lost/damaged units: International shipping has risks, so factor in a few extra units beyond the number of testers, in case a package is lost or a device arrives broken. You don’t want a valuable tester in Australia to be empty-handed because their device got stuck in transit. If a delay or loss happens, communicate quickly with the tester, apologize, and ship a replacement if possible. Testers will understand issues, but they appreciate prompt and honest communication.

    By handling the shipping logistics thoughtfully, you ensure that physical product testing across regions goes as smoothly as possible. Some beta platforms (like BetaTesting) can also assist or advise on logistics if needed, since we’ve managed projects shipping products globally. The core idea is to minimize the burden on testers, they should spend their time testing and giving feedback, not dealing with shipping bureaucracy.

    Check it out: Top 10 AI Terms Startups Need to Know

    Coordinating Across Time Zones

    Time zones are an inevitable puzzle in global testing. Your testers might be spread from California to Cairo to Kolkata, how do you coordinate schedules, especially if your test involves any real-time events or deadlines? The key is flexibility and careful scheduling to accommodate different local times.

    First, if your beta tasks are asynchronous (e.g. complete a list of tasks at your convenience over a week), then time zones aren’t a huge issue beyond setting a reasonable overall schedule. Just be mindful to set deadlines in a way that is fair to all regions. If you say “submit feedback by July 10 at 5:00 PM,” specify the time zone (and perhaps translate it: e.g. “5:00 PM GMT+0, which is 6:00 PM in London, 1:00 PM in New York, 10:30 PM in New Delhi,” etc.). Better yet, use a tool that localizes deadlines for each user or just give a date and allow the end of that date in each tester’s time zone. The goal is to avoid a scenario where it’s July 11 morning for half your testers when it’s still July 10 for you, that can cause confusion or people missing the cutoff. A simple solution is to pick a deadline that effectively gives everyone the same amount of time, or explicitly state different deadlines per region (“submit by 6 PM your local time on July 10”).

    If your test involves synchronous activities, say a scheduled webinar, a multiplayer game session, or a live interview, then you’ll need to plan with time zones in mind. You likely won’t find one time that’s convenient for everyone (world night owls are rare!). One approach is to schedule multiple sessions at different times to cover groups of time zones.

    For example, host one live gameplay session targeting Americas/Europe time, and another for Asia/Pacific time. This way, each tester can join during their daytime rather than at 3 AM. It’s unrealistic to expect, for instance, UK testers to participate in an activity timed for a US evening. As an example, if you need a stress test of a server at a specific moment, you might coordinate “waves” of testers: one wave at 9 PM London time and another at 9 PM New York time, etc. While it splits the crowd, it’s better than poor engagement because half the testers were asleep.

    For general communication, stagger your messages or support availability to match business hours in different regions. If you send an important instruction email, consider that your Australian testers might see it 12 hours before your American testers due to time differences. It can be helpful to use scheduling tools or just time your communications in batches (e.g. send one batch of emails in the morning GMT for Europeans/Asians and another batch later for Americas). Also, beware of idiomatic time references, saying “we’ll regroup tomorrow” in a message can confuse if it’s already tomorrow in another region. Always clarify dates with the month/day to avoid ambiguity.

    Interestingly, having testers across time zones can be an advantage for quickly iterating on feedback. When you coordinate properly, you could receive test results almost 24/7. Essentially, while your U.S. testers sleep, your Asian testers might be busy finding bugs, and vice versa, giving you continuous coverage. To harness this, you can review feedback each morning from one part of the world and make adjustments that another group of testers will see as they begin their day. It’s like following the sun.

    To efficiently track engagement and progress, use a centralized tool (like your beta platform or even a shared dashboard) that shows who has completed which tasks, regardless of time zone. That way, you’re not manually calculating time differences to figure out if Tester X in Australia is actually late or not. Many platforms timestamp submissions in UTC or your local time, so be cautious interpreting them, know what baseline is being used. If needed, just communicate and clarify with testers if you see someone lagging; it might be a time confusion rather than lack of commitment.

    In summary, be timezone-aware in every aspect: scheduling, communications, and expectation setting. Plan in a way that respects local times, your testers will appreciate it and you’ll get better participation. And if you ever find yourself puzzled by a time zone, tools like world clocks or meeting planners are your friend (there are many online services where you plug in cities and get a nice comparison chart). After a couple of global tests, you’ll start memorizing time offsets (“Oh, 10 AM in San Francisco is 6 PM in London, which is 1 AM in Beijing, maybe not ideal for China”). It’s a learning curve but very doable.

    Handling International Data Privacy and Compliance

    Last but certainly not least, data privacy and legal compliance must be considered when running tests across countries. Each region may have its own laws governing user data, personal information, and how it can be collected or transferred. When you invite beta testers, you are essentially collecting personal data (names, emails, maybe usage data or survey answers), so you need to ensure you comply with regulations like Europe’s GDPR, California’s CCPA, and others as applicable.

    The general rule is: follow the strictest applicable laws for any given tester. For example, if you have even a single tester from the EU, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) applies to their data, regardless of where your company is located. GDPR is one of the world’s most robust privacy laws, and non-compliance can lead to hefty fines (up to 4% of global revenue or €20 million).

    So if you’re US-based but testing with EU citizens, you must treat their data per GDPR standards: obtain clear consent for data collection, explain how the data will be used, allow them to request deletion of their data, and secure the data properly. Similarly, if you have testers in California, the CCPA gives them rights like opting out of the sale of personal info, etc., which you should honor.

    What does this mean in practice? Informed consent is paramount. When recruiting testers, provide them with a consent form or agreement that outlines what data you’ll collect (e.g. “We will record your screen during testing” or “We will collect usage logs from the device”), how you will use it, and that by participating they agree to this. Make sure this complies with local requirements (for instance, GDPR requires explicit opt-in consent and the ability to withdraw consent). It’s wise to have a standard beta tester agreement that includes confidentiality (to protect your IP) and privacy clauses. All testers should sign or agree to this before starting. Many companies use electronic click-wrap agreements on their beta signup page.

    Data handling is another aspect: ensure any personal data from testers is stored securely and only accessible to those who need it. If you’re using a beta platform, check that they are GDPR-compliant and ideally have things like EU-US Privacy Shield or Standard Contractual Clauses in place if data is moving internationally. If you’re managing data yourself, consider storing EU tester data on EU servers, or at least use reputable cloud services with strong security.

    Additionally, ask yourself if you really need each piece of personal data you collect. Minimization is a good principle, don’t collect extra identifiable info unless it’s useful for the test. For example, you might need a tester’s phone number for shipping a device or scheduling an interview, but you probably don’t need their full home address if it’s a purely digital test. Whatever data you do collect, only use it for the purposes of the beta test and then dispose of it safely when it’s no longer needed.

    Be mindful of special data regulations in various countries. Some countries have data residency rules (e.g. Russia requires that citizens’ personal data be stored on servers within Russia). If you happen to have testers from such countries, consult legal advice on compliance or avoid collecting highly sensitive data. Also, if your beta involves collecting user-generated content (like videos of testers using the product), get explicit permission to use that data for research. Typically, a clause in the consent that any feedback or content they provide can be used by your company internally for product improvement is sufficient.

    One often overlooked aspect is NDAs and confidentiality from the tester side. While it’s not exactly a privacy law, you’ll likely want testers to keep the beta product and their feedback confidential (to prevent leaks of your features or intellectual property).

    Include a non-disclosure agreement in your terms so that testers agree not to share information about the beta outside of authorized channels. Most genuine testers are happy to comply, they understand they’re seeing pre-release material. Reinforce this by marking communications “Confidential” and perhaps setting up a private forum or feedback tool that isn’t publicly visible.

    In summary, treat tester data with the same care as you would any customer data, if not more, since beta programs sometimes collect more detailed usage info. When in doubt, consult your legal team or privacy experts to ensure you have all the needed consent and data protections in place. It may seem like extra paperwork, but it’s critical. With the legalities handled, you can proceed to actually use those global insights to improve your product.


    Let the Global Insights Shape Your Product

    After executing a global beta test, recruiting diverse users, collecting their feedback, and managing the logistics you’ll end up with a treasure trove of insights. Now it’s time to put those insights to work. The ultimate goal of any beta is to learn and improve the product before the big launch (and even post-launch for continuous improvement).

    When your beta spans multiple countries and cultures, the learnings can be incredibly rich and sometimes surprising. Embracing these global insights will help you adapt your product, marketing, and strategy for success across diverse user groups.

    First, aggregate and analyze the feedback by region and culture. Look for both universal trends and local differences. You might find that users everywhere loved Feature A but struggled with Feature B, that’s a clear mandate to fix Feature B for all. But you may also discover that what one group of users says doesn’t hold true for another group.

    For example, your beta feedback might reveal that U.S. testers find your app’s signup process easy, while many Japanese testers found it confusing (perhaps due to language nuances or different UX expectations). Such contrasts are gold: they allow you to decide whether to implement region-specific changes or a one-size-fits-all improvement. You’re essentially pinpointing exactly what each segment of users needs.

    Use these insights to drive product adaptations. Is there a feature you need to tweak for cultural relevance? For instance, maybe your social app had an “avatar” feature that Western users enjoyed, but in some Asian countries testers expected more privacy and disliked it. You might then make that feature optional or change its default settings in those regions. Or let’s say your e-commerce beta revealed that Indian users strongly prefer cash-on-delivery option, whereas U.S. users are fine with credit cards, you’d want to ensure your payment options at launch reflect that. 

    Global betas also highlight logistical or operational challenges you might face during a full launch. Pay attention to any hiccups that occurred during the test coordination: did testers in one country consistently have trouble connecting to your server? That might indicate you need a closer server node or CDN in that region before launch. Did shipping hardware to a particular country get delayed excessively? That could mean you should set up longer lead times or a local distributor there.

    Perhaps your support team got a lot of questions from one locale, maybe you need a FAQ in that language or a support rep who speaks it. Treat the beta as a rehearsal not just for the product but for all surrounding operations. By solving these in beta, you pave the way for a smoother public rollout in each region.

    Now, how do you measure success across diverse user groups? In a global test, success may look different in different places. It’s important to define key metrics for each segment. For instance, you might measure task completion rates, satisfaction scores, or performance benchmarks separately for Europe, Asia, etc., then compare. The goal is not to pit regions against each other, but to ensure that each one meets an acceptable threshold. If one country’s testers had a 50% task failure rate while others were 90% successful, that’s a red flag to investigate. It could be a localization bug or a fundamentally different user expectation. By segmenting your beta data, you avoid a pitfall of averaging everything together and missing outlier problems. A successful beta outcome is when each target region shows positive indicators that the product meets users’ needs.

    Another way to leverage global beta insights is in your marketing and positioning for launch. Your testers’ feedback tells you what value propositions resonate with different audiences. Perhaps testers in Latin America kept praising your app’s offline functionality (due to spottier internet), while testers in Scandinavia loved the security features. Those are clues to highlight different messaging in those markets’ marketing campaigns. You can even gather testimonials or quotes from enthusiastic beta users around the world (with their permission) to use as social proof in regional marketing. Early adopters’ voices, especially from within a market, can greatly boost credibility when you launch widely.

    One concrete example: Eero, a mesh WiFi startup, ran an extensive beta with users across various home environments. By ensuring a “very diverse representation” of their customer base in the beta, they were able to identify and fix major issues before the official launch.

    They chose testers with different house sizes, layouts, and ISP providers to mirror the breadth of real customers. This meant that when Eero launched, they were confident the product would perform well whether in a small city apartment or a large rural home. That beta-driven refinement led to glowing reviews and a smooth rollout, the diverse insights literally shaped a better product and a winning launch.

    Finally, keep iterating. Global testing is not a one-and-done if your product will continue to evolve. Leverage beta insights to shape not just the launch version, but your long-term roadmap. Some features requested by testers in one region might be scheduled for a later update or a region-specific edition. You might even decide to do follow-up betas or A/B tests targeted at certain countries as you fine-tune. The learnings from this global beta can inform your product development for years, especially as you expand into new markets.

    Crucially, share the insights with your whole team, product designers, engineers, marketers, executives. It helps build a global mindset internally. When an engineer sees feedback like “Users in country X all struggled with the sign-up flow because the phone number formatting was unfamiliar,” it creates empathy and understanding that design can’t be U.S.-centric (for instance). When a marketer hears that “Testers in country Y didn’t understand the feature until we described it in this way,” they can adjust the messaging in that locale.

    Check it out: We have a full article on AI in User Research & Testing in 2025: The State of The Industry


    Conclusion

    Global app testing provides the multi-cultural, real-world input that can elevate your product from good to great on the world stage. By thoughtfully recruiting international testers, handling the cross-border logistics, and truly listening to the feedback from each region, you equip yourself with the knowledge to launch and grow your product worldwide.

    The insights you gain, whether it’s a minor UI tweak or a major feature pivot will help ensure that when users from New York to New Delhi to New South Wales try your product, it feels like it was made for them. And in a sense, it was, because their voices helped shape it.

    Global beta testing isn’t always easy, but the payoff is a product that can confidently cross borders and an organization that learns how to operate globally. By following the strategies outlined, from incentive planning to localizing communication to embracing culturally diverse feedback, you can navigate the challenges and reap the rewards of testing all around the world. So go ahead and take your product into the wild worldwide; with proper preparation and openness to learn, the global insights will guide you to success.


    Have questions? Book a call in our call calendar.

  • How to Get Humans for AI Feedback

    Why the Right Audience Matters for AI Feedback

    AI models, especially large language models (LLMs) used for chatbots and a host of other modern AI functionality, learn and improve through human feedback. But the feedback you use to evaluate and fine-tune your AI models greatly influences how useful your models and agents become. It’s crucial to recruit participants for AI feedback who truly represent the end-users or have the domain expertise that is needed to improve your model.

    As one testing guide from Poll the People puts it: 

    “You should always test with people who are in your target audience. This ensures you’re getting accurate feedback about your product or service.” 

    In other words, to get feedback to fine-tune an AI model or functional product that is designed to provide financial advice, you should rely on experts that are qualified to give feedback on such a product, for example financial professionals or retail (consumer) investors. If you’re relying on the foundational model or a model that was fine-tuned using your average joe schmo, it’s probably not going to be provide great results!

    Here’s what we will explore:

    1. Why the Right Audience Matters for AI Feedback?
    2. From Foundation Models to Expert-Tuned AI
    3. Strategies to Recruit the Right People for AI Feedback

    Using the wrong audience for AI feedback can lead to misleading or low-value output. For example, testing a specialized medical chatbot on random laypersons might yield feedback about its general grammar or interface, but miss crucial medical inaccuracies that a doctor would catch. Similarly, an AI coding assistant evaluated only by novice programmers might appear fine, while seasoned software engineers would expose its deeper shortcomings.

    Relying solely on eager but non-representative beta users can result in a very generic clump of usage and bug reports while overlooking some more nuanced aspects of the user experience that your target audience might care about. In short, the quality of AI feedback is only as good as the humans who provide it.

    The recent success of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) in training models like ChatGPT underscores the importance of having the right people in the loop. RLHF works by having humans rank or score AI outputs and using those preferences to fine-tune the model. If those human raters don’t understand the domain or user needs, their feedback could optimize the AI in the wrong direction.

    To truly align AI behavior with what users want and expect, we need feedback from users who mirror the intended audience and experts who can judge accuracy in specialized tasks.

    Check it out: See our posts on Improving AI Products with Human Feedback and RLHF


    From Foundation Models to Expert-Tuned AI

    Many of today’s foundation models (the big general-purpose AIs) were initially trained on vast data from the internet or crowdsourced annotationd, not exclusively by domain experts. For instance, most LLMs (like OpenAI’s) are primarily trained on internet text and later improved via human feedback provided by contracted crowd workers. These low paid taskers may be skilled at the technical details of labeling / annotating, but almost certainly they are not experts in much of the content they are actually labeling.

    This broad non-expert training is one reason these models can sometimes produce incorrect medical or legal advice: the model wasn’t built with expert-only data and it wasn’t evaluated and fine-tuned with expert feedback. In short, general AI models often lack specialized expertise because they weren’t trained by specialists.

    To unlock higher accuracy and utility in specific domains, AI engineers have learned that models require evaluation and fine-tuning with expert audiences. By recruiting actual software developers to provide examples and feedback, the AI could learn to generate code at a higher quality.

    An example comes from the medical AI realm. Google’s Med-PaLM 2, a large language model for medicine, was fine-tuned and evaluated with the help of medical professionals. In fact, the model’s answers were evaluated by human raters, both physicians and lay people to ensure clinical relevance and safety. In that evaluation, doctors rated the AI’s answers as comparable in quality to answers from other clinicians on most axes, a result only achievable by involving experts in the training and feedback loop.

    Recognizing this need, new services have emerged to connect AI projects with subject-matter specialists. For instance, Pareto.AI focuses on expert labeling. The premise is that an AI can be taught or evaluated by people who deeply understand the content, be it doctors, lawyers, financial analysts, or specific consumers (for consumer products). This expert-driven approach can significantly improve an AI’s performance in specialized tasks, from diagnosing medical images to interpreting legal documents. Domain experts ensure that fine-tuning aligns with industry standards and real-world accuracy, rather than just general internet.

    The bottom line is that while foundation models give us powerful general intelligence, human feedback from the right humans is what turns that general ability into expert performance. Whether it’s via formal RLHF programs or informal beta tests, getting qualified people to train, test, and refine AI systems is often the secret sauce behind the best AI products.

    Check it out: Top 10 AI Terms Startups Need to Know


    Strategies to Recruit the Right People for AI Feedback

    So how can teams building AI products, especially generative AI like chatbots or LLM-powered apps, recruit the right humans to provide feedback? Below are key strategies and channels to find and engage the ideal participants for your AI testing and training efforts.

    1. Tapping Internal Talent and Loyal Users (Internal Recruitment)

    One immediate resource is within your own walls. Internal beta testing (sometimes called “dogfooding”) involves using your company’s employees or existing close customers to test AI products early. Employees can be great guinea pigs for an AI chatbot, since they’re readily available and already understand the product vision.

    Many organizations run “alpha tests” internally before any external release. This helps catch obvious bugs or alignment issues. For example, during internal tests at Google, employees famously tried early versions of AI models like Google Assistant and provided feedback before public rollout. However, be mindful of the limitations of internal testing. By nature, employees are not fully representative of your target market, and they might be biased or hesitant to give frank criticism. 

    Internal recruitment can extend beyond employees to a trusted circle of power users or early adopters of your product. These could be customers who have shown enthusiasm for your company and volunteered to try new features. Such insiders are often invested in your success and will gladly spend time giving detailed feedback.

    In the context of AI, if you’re developing, say, an AI design assistant, your long-time users in design roles could be invited to an early access program to critique the AI’s suggestions. They bring both a user’s perspective and a bit of domain expertise, acting as a bridge before you open testing to the wider world.

    Overall, leveraging internal and close-known users is a low-cost, quick way to get initial human feedback for your AI. Just remember to diversify beyond the office when you move into serious beta testing, so you don’t fall into the trap of insular feedback.

    2. Reaching Out via Social Media and Communities

    The internet can be your ally when seeking humans to test AI (but of course beware of fraud, as there is a lot out there).

    You can find people in their natural digital habitats who match your target profile. Social media, forums, and online communities are excellent places to recruit testers, especially for consumer-facing AI products.

    Start by identifying where your likely users hang out. Are you building a generative AI tool for writers? Check out writing communities on Reddit, such as r/writing or r/selfpublish, and Facebook groups for authors. Creating a new AI API for developers? You might visit programming forums like Stack Overflow or subreddits like r/programming or r/machinelearning. There are even dedicated Reddit communities like r/betatests and r/AlphaandBetausers specifically for connecting product owners with volunteer beta testers.

    When approaching communities, engage authentically. Don’t just spam “please test my app”, instead go to the chosen subreddits and provide truly helpful, detailed comments and then drop the link to your beta signup page.

    This approach of offering value first can build goodwill and attract testers who are genuinely interested in your AI. On X and LinkedIn, you can similarly share interesting content about your AI project and include a call for beta participants. Using hashtags like #betaTesting, #AI or niche tags related to your product can improve visibility. For instance, tweeting “Looking for early adopters to try our new AI interior design assistant #betatesting #homedecor #interiordesign”.

    Beyond broad social media, consider special interest communities and forums. If your AI product is domain-specific, go where the domain experts are. For a medical AI, you might reach out on medical professional forums or LinkedIn groups for doctors. For a gaming AI (say an NPC dialogue generator), gaming forums or Discord servers could be fertile ground. The key is to clearly explain what your AI does, what kind of feedback or usage you need, and what testers get in return (early access, or even small incentives). Many people love being on the cutting edge of tech and will volunteer for the novelty alone, especially if you make them feel like partners in shaping the AI.

    One caveat: recruiting from open communities can net a lot of enthusiasts, but not all will match your eventual user base. If you notice an imbalance, for example all your volunteer chatbot testers are tech-savvy 20-somethings but your target market is retirees, you may need to adjust course and recruit through other channels to fill the gaps. Social recruiting is best combined with targeted methods to ensure diversity and representativeness.

    3. Using Targeted Advertising to Attract Niche Testers

    If organic outreach isn’t yielding the specific types of testers you need, paid advertising can be an effective recruitment strategy. Targeted ads let you cast a net for exactly the demographic or interest group you want, which is extremely useful for finding niche experts or users for AI feedback.

    For example, imagine you’re fine-tuning an AI legal advisor and you really need feedback from licensed attorneys. You could run a LinkedIn ad campaign targeted at users with job titles like “Attorney” or interests in “Legal Tech.” Likewise, Facebook ads allow targeting by interests, age, location, etc., which could help find, say, small business owners to test an AI bookkeeping assistant, or teachers to try an AI education tool. As one guide suggests, “a well-targeted ad campaign on an appropriate social network could pull in some members of your ideal audience to participate”, even if they’ve never heard of your product before.

    Yes, advertising costs money, but it can be worth the investment to get high-quality feedback. For relatively little spend, you might quickly recruit a dozen medical specialists or a hundred finance professionals, groups that might be hard to find just by posting on general forums. Platforms like Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Reddit all offer ad tools that can zero in on particular communities or professions.

    When crafting your ad or sponsored post for recruitment, keep it brief and enticing. Highlight the unique opportunity (e.g. “Help shape a new AI tool for doctors: looking for MDs to give feedback on a medical chatbot, early access + Amazon gift card for participants”). Make the signup process easy (link to a simple form or landing page). And be upfront about what you’re asking for (time commitment, what testers will need to do with the AI, etc.) and what they get (incentives, early use, or just the satisfaction of contributing to innovation).

    Paid ads shine when you need specific humans at scale, on a timeline. Just be sure to monitor the sign-ups to ensure they truly fit your criteria. You may need a screener question or follow-up to verify respondents (for example, confirm someone is truly a nurse before relying on their test feedback for your health AI).

    4. Leveraging Platforms Built for Participant Recruitment

    In the last decade, a number of participant recruitment platforms have emerged to make finding the right testers or annotators much easier. These services maintain large panels of people, often hundreds of thousands, and provide tools to filter and invite those who meet your needs. For teams building generative AI products, these platforms can dramatically accelerate and improve the process of getting quality human feedback.

    Below, we discuss a few key platforms and how they fit into AI user feedback:

    • BetaTesting: is a platform expressly designed to connect product teams with real-world testers. It boasts the largest pool of real world beta testers, including everyday consumers as well as professionals and dedicated QA testers, all with 100+ targeting criteria to choose from.

      In practical terms, BetaTesting lets you specify exactly who you want, e.g. “finance professionals in North America using iPhone,” or “Android users ages 18-24 who are heavy social media users”, and then recruits those people from its community of over 450,000+ testers to try your product. For AI products, this is incredibly valuable. You can find testers who match niche demographics or usage patterns that align with your AI’s purpose, ensuring the feedback you get is relevant.

      Through BetaTesting’s platform, you can deploy test instructions, surveys, and tasks (like “try these 5 prompts with our chatbot and rate the responses”), and testers’ responses are collected in one place. This all-in-one approach takes the logistical headache out of running a beta, letting you focus on analyzing the AI feedback. BetaTesting emphasizes high-quality, vetted participants (all are ID-verified, not anonymous), which leads to more reliable feedback. Notably, BetaTesting has specific solutions for AI products, including AI product research, RLHF, evals, fine-tuning, and data collection).

      In summary, if you want a turnkey solution to find and manage great testers for a generative AI, BetaTesting is a top choice. It offers a large, diverse tester pool, fine-grained targeting, and a robust platform to gather feedback. (It’s no surprise we highlight BetaTesting here: its ability to deliver the exact audience you need makes it a preferred platform for AI user feedback.)
    • Pareto.AI: is a newer entrant that specializes in providing expert human data for AI and LLM (Large Language Model) training. Think of Pareto as a bridge between AI developers and subject-matter experts who can label data or evaluate outputs.

      This platform is particularly useful when fine-tuning an AI requires domain-specific knowledge. For example, if you need certified accountants to label financial documents for an AI, or experienced marketers to rank AI-generated ad copy. Pareto verifies the credentials of its experts and ensures they meet the skill criteria (their workforce is dubbed the top 0.01% of data labelers).

      In an AI feedback context, Pareto can be used to recruit professionals to fine-tune reward models or evaluate model outputs in areas where generic crowd feedback wouldn’t cut it. For instance, a law-focused LLM could be improved by having Pareto’s network of lawyers score the accuracy and helpfulness of its answers, feeding those judgments back into training. The advantage here is quality and credibility. You’re not just getting any crowd feedback, but expert feedback. The trade-off is that it’s a premium service (and likely costs more per participant than general crowdsourcing). For critical AI applications where mistakes are costly, this investment can be very worthwhile.
    • Prolific: is an online research platform widely used in academic and industry studies, known for its high-quality, diverse participant pool and transparent platform. Prolific makes it easy to run surveys or experiments and is increasingly used for AI data collection and model evaluation tasks, connecting researchers to a global pool of 200,000+ vetted participants for fast, reliable data.

      For AI user feedback, Prolific shines when you need a large sample of everyday end-users to test an AI feature or provide labeled feedback. For example, you could deploy a study where hundreds of people chat with your AI assistant and then answer survey questions about the experience (e.g. did the AI answer correctly? was it polite? would you use it again?). Prolific’s prescreening tools let you target users by demographics and even by specialized traits via screening questionnaires.

      One of Prolific’s strengths is data quality. Studies have found Prolific participants to be attentive and honest compared to some other online pools. If you need rapid feedback at scale, Prolific can often deliver complete results quickly, which is great for iterative tuning. Prolific is also useful for AI bias and fairness testing: you can intentionally recruit diverse groups (by age, gender, background) to see how different people perceive your AI or where it might fail.

      While Prolific participants are typically not “expert professionals” like Pareto’s, they represent a broad swath of real-world users, which is invaluable for consumer AI products.
    • Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk): is one of the oldest and best-known crowdsourcing marketplaces. It provides access to a massive on-demand workforce (500,000+ workers globally) for performing “Human Intelligence Tasks”, everything from labeling images to taking surveys.

      Amazon describes MTurk as “a crowdsourcing marketplace that makes it easier for individuals and businesses to outsource their processes and jobs to a distributed workforce… [it] enables companies to harness the collective intelligence, skills, and insights from a global workforce”. In the context of AI, MTurk has been used heavily to gather training data and annotations, for example, creating image captions, transcribing audio, or moderating content that trains AI models. It’s also been used for RLHF-style feedback at scale (though often without strict vetting of workers’ expertise).

      The benefit of MTurk is scale and speed at low cost. If you design a straightforward task, you can get thousands of annotations or model-rating judgments in hours. For instance, you might ask MTurk workers to rank which of two chatbot responses is better, to generate a large preference dataset. However, the quality of MTurk work can be variable. Workers come from all walks of life with varying attention levels; you have to implement quality controls (like test questions or worker qualification filters) to ensure reliable results.

      MTurk is best suited when your feedback tasks can be broken into many micro-tasks that don’t require deep expertise, e.g. collect 10,000 ratings of AI-generated sentences for fluency. It’s less ideal if you need lengthy, thoughtful responses or expert judgment, though you can sometimes screen for workers with specific backgrounds using qualifications. Many AI teams integrate MTurk with tools like Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth to manage data labeling pipelines.

      As an example of its use, the Allen Institute for AI noted they use MTurk to “build datasets that help our models learn common sense knowledge… [MTurk] provides a flexible platform that enables us to harness human knowledge to advance machine learning research.” 

      In summary, MTurk is a powerhouse for large-scale human feedback but requires careful setup to target the right workers and maintain quality.

    Each of these platforms has its niche, and they aren’t mutually exclusive. In fact, savvy AI product teams often use a combination of methods: perhaps engaging a small expert group via Pareto or internal recruitment for fine-tuning, a beta test via BetaTesting for functional product feedback for AI products, and a large-scale MTurk job for specific data labeling.

    The good news is that you don’t have to reinvent the wheel to find testers, solutions like BetaTesting and others have already assembled the crowds and experts you need, so you can focus on what feedback to ask for.

    Check it out: We have a full article on Recruiting Humans for RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback)


    Conclusion

    In the development of generative AI products, humans truly are the secret ingredient that turns a good model into a great product. But not just any humans will do, you need feedback from the right audience, whether that means domain experts to ensure accuracy or representative end-users to ensure usability and satisfaction.

    As we’ve discussed, many groundbreaking AI systems initially struggled until human feedback from targeted groups helped align them with real-world needs. By carefully recruiting who tests and trains your AI, you steer its evolution in the direction that best serves your customers.

    Fortunately, we have more tools than ever in 2025 to recruit and manage these ideal testers. From internal beta programs and social media outreach to dedicated platforms like BetaTesting (with its vast, high-quality tester community) and specialist networks like Pareto.AI, you can get virtually any type of tester or annotator you require.

    The key is to plan a recruitment strategy that matches your AI’s goals: use employees and loyal users for quick early feedback, reach out in communities where your target users spend time, run targeted ads or posts when you need to fill specific gaps, and leverage recruitment platforms to scale up and formalize the process.

    By investing the effort to find the right people for AI feedback, you invest in the success of your AI. You’ll catch issues that only a true user would notice, get ideas that only an expert would suggest, and ultimately build a more robust, trustworthy system. Whether you’re fine-tuning an LLM’s answers or beta testing a new AI-powered app, the insights from well-chosen humans are irreplaceable. They are how we ensure our intelligent machines truly serve and delight the humans they’re built for.

    So don’t leave your AI’s growth to chance, recruit the audiences that will push it to be smarter, safer, and more impactful. With the right humans in the loop, there’s no limit to how far your AI product can go.


    Have questions? Book a call in our call calendar.

  • Top 5 Beta Testing Companies Online

    Beta testing is a critical practice for product and engineering teams to test and get feedback for their apps, websites, and physical products with real users before a new product launch or feature launch. By catching bugs, gathering UX feedback, and ensuring performance in real-world scenarios, beta testing helps teams launch with confidence. Fortunately, there are several specialized companies that make beta testing easier by providing platforms, communities of testers, and advanced tools.

    This article explores five top online beta testing companies: 

    BetaTestingApplauseCentercodeRainforest QA, and UserTesting, discussing their strengths, specializations, how they differ, any AI capabilities they offer, and examples of their success. Each of these services has something unique to offer for startups and product teams looking to improve product quality and user satisfaction.


    BetaTesting

    BetaTesting.com is one of the top beta testing companies, and provides a web platform to connect companies with a large community of real-world beta testers. BetaTesting has grown into a robust solution for crowdsourced beta testing and user research and is one of the top rated companies by independent review provider G2 for crowdtesting services.

    The platform boasts a network of over 450,000 participants across diverse demographics, allowing teams to recruit testers that match their target audience. BetaTesting’s mission is to simplify the process of collecting and analyzing user feedback, making even complex data easy to understand in practical terms. This makes it especially appealing to startups that need actionable insights without heavy lifting.

    Key strengths and features of BetaTesting include:

    Recruiting High Quality Real People: BetaTesting maintains their own first-party panel of verified, vetted, non-anonymous real-world people. They make it easy to filter and select testers based on 100’s of targeting criteria ranging from demographics like age, location, education, to advanced targeting such as product usage, health and wellness, and work life and tools.

    BetaTesting provides participant rewards that are 10X higher than many competitive testing and research platforms. This is helpful because your target audience probably isn’t struggling to make $5 an hour by clicking test links all day like those on many other research platforms. Providing meaningful incentives allows BetaTesting to recruit high quality people that match your target audience. These are real consumers and business professionals spanning every demographic, interest, and profession – not professional survey takers or full-time taskers. The result is higher quality data and feedback.

    Anti-Fraud Procedures: BetaTesting is a leader in providing a secure and fraud-free platform and incorporating features and tools to ensure you’re getting quality feedback from real people. Some of these steps include:

    • ID verification for testers
    • No VPN or anonymous IPs. Always know your testers are located where they say they are.
    • SMS verification
    • LinkedIn integration
    • Validation of 1 account per person
    • Anti-bot checks and detection for AI use
    • Fraud checks through the incentive partner Tremendous

    Flexible Testing Options in the Real World: BetaTesting supports anything from one-time “bug hunt” sessions to multi-week beta trials. Teams can run short tests or extended programs spanning days or months, adapting to their needs. This flexibility is valuable for companies that iterate quickly or plan to conduct long-term user research.

    Testers provide authentic feedback on real devices in natural environments. The platform delivers detailed bug reports and even usability video recordings of testers using the product. This helps uncover issues with battery usage, performance, and user experience under real conditions, not just lab settings.

    BetaTesting helps collect feedback in three core ways:

    • Surveys (written feedback)
    • Videos (usability videos, unboxing videos, etc)
    • Bug reports

    Check it out: Test types you can run on BetaTesting

    Human Feedback for AI Products: When building AI products and improving AI models, it’s critical to get feedback and data from your users and customers. BetaTesting helps companies get human feedback for AI to build better/smarter models, agents & AI product experiences. This includes targeting the right people to power AI product research, evals, fine-tuning, and data collection.

    BetaTesting’s focus on real-world testing at scale has led to tangible success stories. For example, Triinu Magi (CTO of Neura) noted how quick and adaptive the process was: 

    “The process was very easy and convenient. BetaTesting can move very fast and adapt to our changing needs. It helped us understand better how the product works in the real world. We improved our battery consumption and also our monitoring capabilities.”

    Another founder, Robert Muño, co-founder of Typeform, summed up the quality of BetaTesting testers: 

    “BetaTesting testers are smart, creative and eager to discover new products. They will get to the essence of your tool in no time and give you quality feedback enough to shape your roadmap for well into the future.”

    These testimonials underscore BetaTesting’s strength in rapidly providing companies with high-quality testers and actionable feedback. While BetaTesting also incorporates AI features throughout the platform, including AI analytics to help interpret tester feedback, including summarization, transcription, sentiment analysis, and more.

    Overall, BetaTesting excels in scalable beta programs with real people in real environments and is a perfect fit for product teams that want to get high quality testing and feedback from real people, not professional survey clickers or taskers.


    Applause

    Applause grew out of one of the first crowdtesting sites called uTest and markets itself as a leading provider of digital quality assurance. Founded in 2007 as uTest, Applause provides fully managed testing services by leveraging a big community of professional testers. Applause indicates that they have over 1.5 million digital testers. This expansive reach means Applause can test digital products in practically every real-world scenario, across all devices, OSes, browsers, languages, and locations.

    For a startup or enterprise releasing a new app, Applause’s community can surface issues that might only appear in specific regions or on obscure device configurations, providing confidence that the product works for “everyone, everywhere.”

    What sets Applause apart is its comprehensive, managed approach to quality through fully managed testing services:

    Full-Service Testing – Applause assigns a project manager and a hand-picked team of testers for each client engagement. They handle the test planning, execution, and results delivery, so your internal team isn’t burdened with logistics. The testers can perform exploratory testing to find unexpected bugs and also execute structured test cases to verify specific functionality. This dual approach ensures both creative real-world issues and core requirements are covered. Because it’s fully managed, it can be a lot more expensive than self-service alternatives.

    Diverse Real-World Coverage – With testers in over 200 countries and on countless device/browser combinations, Applause can cover a wide matrix of testing conditions.  For product teams aiming at a global audience, this diversity is invaluable.

    Specialty Testing Domains – Applause’s services span beyond basic functional testing. They offer usability and user experience (UX) studies, payment workflow testing, accessibility audits, AI model training/validation, voice interface testing, security testing, and more. For example, Applause has been trusted to expand accessibility testing for Cisco’s Webex platform, ensuring the product works for users with disabilities.

    AI-Powered Platform – Applause has started to integrate artificial intelligence into its processes like some of the other companies on this list. The company incorporated AI-driven capabilities, built with IBM watsonx, into its own testing platform to help improve speed, accuracy and scale” of test case management. Additionally, Applause launched offerings for testing generative AI systems, including providing human “red teaming” to probe generative AI models for security vulnerabilities.

    In short, Applause uses AI both as a tool to streamline testing and as a domain, giving clients feedback on AI-driven products.

    Applause’s track record includes many success stories, especially for enterprise product teams.

    As an example of Applause’s impact, IBM noted that Applause enables brands to test digital experiences globally to retain customers, citing Applause’s ability to ensure quality across all devices and demographics.

    If you’re a startup or a product team seeking fully managed quality assurance through crowdtesting, Applause is a good choice. It combines the power of human insight with professional management, a formula that has helped make crowdtesting an industry standard.


    Centercode

    Centercode takes a slightly different angle on beta testing: it provides a robust platform for managing beta programs and user testing with an emphasis on automation and data handling. Centercode has been a stalwart in the beta testing space for over 20 years, helping tech companies like Google, HP, and Verizon run successful customer testing programs. Instead of primarily supplying external testers, it excels at giving product teams the tools to organize their own beta tests, whether with employees, existing customers, or smaller user groups.

    Think of Centercode as the “internal infrastructure” companies can use to orchestrate beta feedback, offering a software platform to facilitate the process of recruiting testers, distributing builds, collecting feedback, and analyzing bug reports in one centralized hub.

    Centercode’s key strengths for startups and product teams include:

    Automation and Efficiency: Centercode aims to build automation into each phase of beta testing to eliminate tedious tasks. For instance, an AI assistant called “Ted AI” can “generate test plans, surveys, and reports in seconds”, send personalized reminders to testers, and accelerate feedback cycles. This can help lean product teams manage the testing process as it reduces the manual effort needed to run a thorough beta test.

    Centralized Feedback & Issue Tracking: All tester feedback (bug reports, suggestions, survey responses) flows into one platform. Testers can log issues directly in Centercode, which makes them immediately visible to all stakeholders. No more juggling spreadsheets or emails. Bugs and suggestions are tracked, de-duplicated, and scored intelligently to highlight what matters most.

    Rich Media and Integrations: Recognizing the need for deeper insight, Centercode now enables video feedback through a feature called Replays, which can records video sessions and provide analysis on top. Seeing a tester’s experience on video can reveal usability issues that a written bug report might miss. Similar to BetaTesting, it integrates with developer tools and even app stores, for example, it connects with Apple TestFlight and Google Play Console to automate mobile beta distribution and onboarding of testers. This saves time for product teams managing mobile app betas.

    Expert Support and Community Management: Centercode offers managed services to help run the program if a team is short on resources. Companies can hire Centercode to provide program management experts who handle recruiting testers, setting up test projects, and keeping participants engaged. This on-demand support is useful for companies that are new to beta testing best practices. Furthermore, Centercode enables companies to nurture their own tester communities over time.

    Crucially, Centercode has also embraced AI to supercharge beta testing. The platform’s new AI capabilities were highlighted in its 2025 launch: 

    “Centercode 10x builds on two decades of beta testing leadership, introducing AI-driven automation, real-world video insights, seamless app store integrations, and expert support to help teams deliver better products, faster.” 

    By integrating AI, Centercode marries efficiency with depth, for instance, automatically scoring bug reports by likely impact.

    Centercode’s approach is ideal for product managers who want full control and visibility into the testing process. A successful use case can be seen with companies that have niche user communities or hardware products: they use Centercode to recruit the right enthusiasts, gather their feedback in a structured way, and turn that into actionable insights for engineering. Because Centercode is an all-in-one platform, it ensures nothing falls through the cracks. 

    For any startup or product team that wants to run a high-quality beta program (whether with 20 testers or 2,000 testers), Centercode provides the scalable, automated backbone to do so effectively.

    Check this article out: AI User Feedback: Improving AI Products with Human Feedback


    Rainforest QA

    Rainforest QA is primarily an automated QA company that focuses on automated functional testing, designed for the rapid pace of SaaS startups and agile development teams. Rainforest is best known for its testing platform that blends automated and manual powered testing on defined QA test scripts. Unlike traditional beta platforms that test in the real-world on real-devices, Rainforest is powered a pool of inexpensive overseas testers (available 24/7) who execute tests in a controlled, cloud-based environment using virtual machines and emulated devices.

    Rainforest’s philosophy is to integrate testing seamlessly into development cycles, often enabling companies to run tests for each code release and get results back in minutes. This focus on speed and integration makes Rainforest especially appealing to product teams practicing continuous delivery.

    Standout features and strengths include:

    Fast Test Results for Defined QA Test Scripts: Rainforest is engineered for quick turnaround. When you write test scenarios and submit them, their crowd of QA specialists executes them in parallel. As a result, test results often come back in an average of 17 minutes after submission, an astonishing speed. Testers are available around the clock, so even a last-minute build on a Friday night can be tested immediately. This speed instills confidence for fast-moving startups to push updates without lengthy QA delays.

    Consistent, Controlled Environments: A unique differentiator of Rainforest is that all tests run on virtual machines (VMs) in the cloud, ensuring each test runs in a clean, identical environment. Testers use these VMs rather than their own unpredictable devices. This approach avoids the “works on my machine” syndrome, results are reliable and reproducible because every tester sees the same environment.

    While Applause or BetaTesting focus on real-world device variation, Rainforest’s model trades some of that for consistency; it’s like a lab test versus an in-the-wild test. This could mean fewer false alarms due to unique device settings, and easier bug replication by developers, but also a difficulty in finding edge cases and testing your product in real-world conditions.

    No-Code Test Authoring with AI Assistance: Rainforest enables non-engineers (like product managers or designers) to create automated test cases in plain English using a no-code editor. Recently, they’ve supercharged this capability with generative AI. The platform can generate test scripts quickly from plain-English prompts  essentially, you describe a user scenario and the AI helps build the test steps. Moreover, Rainforest employs AI self-healing: if minor changes in your app’s UI would normally break a test, the AI can automatically adjust selectors or steps so the test doesn’t fail on a trivial change. This dramatically reduces test maintenance, a common pain in automation. By integrating AI into test creation and maintenance, Rainforest ensures that even as your product UI evolves, your test suite keeps up with minimal manual updates.

    Integrated Manual and Automated Testing: Rainforest offers both fully automated tests (run by robots) and crowd-powered manual tests, all through one platform. For example, you can run a suite of regression tests automated by the Rainforest system, and also trigger an exploratory test where human testers try to break the app without a script. All results – with screenshots, videos, logs – come back into a unified dashboard.

    Every test run is recorded on video with detailed logs, so developers get rich diagnostics for any failures. Rainforest even sends multiple testers to execute the same test in parallel and cross-verifies their results for accuracy, ensuring you don’t get false positives.

    Rainforest QA has proven valuable for many startups who need a scalable QA process without building a large in-house QA team. One of its benefits is the ability to integrate into CI/CD pipelines – for instance, running a suite of tests on each GitHub pull request or each deployment automatically. This catches bugs early and speeds up release cycles.

    All told, Rainforest QA is a great choice for startups and companies that need script-based QA functional testing and prioritize speed, continuous integration, and reliable test automation. It’s like having a QA team on-call for quick testing to cut out repetitive grunt work.


    UserTesting

    UserTesting is a bit different than the other platforms on this list because they focus primarily on usability videos. While most of the pure beta testing platforms include the ability to report bugs, validate features, and get high-level user experience feedback, UserTesting is primarily about using usability videos ( screen recordings + audio) to understanding why users might struggle with your product or how they feel about it.

    The UserTesting platform provides on-demand access to a panel of participants who match your target audience, and it records video sessions of these users as they perform tasks on your app, website, or prototype. You get to watch and hear real people using your product, voicing their thoughts and frustrations, which is incredibly insightful for product managers and UX designers. For startups, this kind of feedback can be pivotal in refining the user interface or onboarding flow before a broader launch.

    UserTesting has since expanded through the merger with UserZoom to include many of the quick UX design-focused tests that UserZoom was previously known for. This include things like card sorting, tree testing, click testing, etc.

    The core strengths and differentiators of UserTesting are:

    Specialization in Usability Videos: UserTesting specializes in usability videos. This means that the platform is primarily about gathering human insights through video: what users like, what confuses them, what they expect. The result is typically a richer understanding of your product’s usability. For example, you might discover through UserTesting that new users don’t notice a certain button or can’t figure out a feature, leading you to redesign it before launch.

    Live User Narratives on Video: UserTesting’s hallmark is the video think-aloud session. You define tasks or questions, and the testers record themselves as they go through them, often speaking their thoughts. You receive videos (and transcripts) showing exactly where someone got frustrated or delighted. This qualitative data (facial expressions, tone of voice, click paths, etc.) is something purely quantitative beta testing can miss. It’s like doing a live usability lab study, but online and much faster. The platform also captures on-screen interactions and can provide session recordings for later analysis.

    Targeted Audience and Test Templates: UserTesting has a broad panel of participants worldwide, and you can filter them by demographics, interests, or even by certain behaviors. This ensures the feedback is relevant to your product’s intended market. Moreover, UserTesting provides templates and guidance for common test scenarios (like onboarding flows, e-commerce checkout, etc.), which is helpful for startups new to user research.

    AI-Powered Analysis of Feedback: Dealing with many hour-long user videos could be time-consuming, so UserTesting has introduced AI capabilities to help analyze and summarize the feedback. Their AI Insight Summary (leveraging GPT technology) automatically reviews the verbal and behavioral data in session videos to identify key themes and pain points. It can produce a succinct summary of what multiple users struggled with, which saves researchers time.

    The value of UserTesting is perhaps best illustrated by real use cases. One example is ZoomShift (a SaaS company) who drastically improved its user onboarding after running tests on UserTesting. By watching users attempt to sign up and get started, the founders identified exactly where people were getting stuck. They made changes and saw setup conversion rates jump from 12% to 87% – a >700% improvement in conversions. As the co-founder reported, 

    “We used UserTesting to get the feedback we needed to increase our setup conversions from 12% to 87%. That’s a jump of 75 percentage points!”

    Many product teams find that a few hours of watching user videos can reveal UI and UX problems that, once fixed, significantly boost engagement or sales.

    UserTesting is widely used not only by startups but also by design and product teams at large companies (Adobe, Canva, and many others are referenced as customers). It’s an essential tool for human-centered design, ensuring that products are intuitive and enjoyable.

    In summary, if your team’s goal is to understand your users deeply and create an optimal user interface flows, UserTesting is the go-to platform. It complements the more high-level user experience and bug-oriented testing services by provided by the core beta testing providers and provdes the voice of the customer directly, helping you build products that truly resonate with your target audience.

    Now that you know the Top 5 Beta Testing companies online, check out: Top 10 AI Terms Startups Need to Know


    Still Thinking About Which One To Choose?

    Get in touch with our team at BetaTesting to discuss your needs. Of course we’re biased, but we’re happy to tell you if we feel another company would be a better fit for your needs.


    Have questions? Book a call in our call calendar.